Interpersonal Comparisons of Well‐Being
Interpersonal Comparisons of Well‐Being
复制标题
幸福感的人际比较
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548477.003.0023
复制
发表时间：
2004
期刊：
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
W. Bossert
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Blackorby;W. Bossert
这篇论文将作为《牛津政治经济学手册》的一章出版，介绍了社会选择理论与幸福的人际比较。我们认为，从阿罗定理的负面结论逃脱的最有前途的路线是使用一个更丰富的信息环境比序数的可测量性和缺乏人际可比性的福祉。我们讨论福利主义的社会评价（这要求在两个选项中的个人幸福水平是他们的社会排名的唯一决定因素），并提出一些重要的社会评价排序的特征。
This paper, which is to be published as a chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, provides an introduction to social-choice theory with interpersonal comparisons of well-being. We argue that the most promising route of escape from the negative conclusion of Arrow’s theorem is to use a richer informational environment than ordinal measurability and the absence of interpersonal comparability of well-being. We discuss welfarist social evaluation (which requires that the levels of individual well-being in two alternatives are the only determinants of their social ranking) and present characterizations of some important social-evaluation orderings.