Of flowers and twigs: phylogenetic revision of the plant-mimicking praying mantises (Mantodea: Empusidae and Hymenopodidae) with a new suprageneric classification

Of flowers and twigs: phylogenetic revision of the plant-mimicking praying mantises (Mantodea: Empusidae and Hymenopodidae) with a new suprageneric classification
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/syen.12134
复制
发表时间:
2015-10-01
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Wieland, Frank
Wieland, Frank
中科院分区:
农林科学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Svenson, Gavin J.;Hardy, Nate B.;Wieland, Frank

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们提出了一个超属的修订,模仿植物的螳螂家族Empusidae和Hymenopodidae的基础上,全证据的系统发育分析与完整的属。我们从外部形态中编码了124个字符,并将这些字符与包含10个基因片段的DNA数据集结合在一起,形成具有7514个核酸位点的比对矩阵,以估计系统发育关系。我们通过分子、形态和总证据分析恢复了大部分一致的拓扑结构。该科及其亚科均为单系分类。膜孔菌科(Hymenopodidae)与叶蜂科(Phyllothelyinae)和叶蜂科(Phyllothelyinae)为副寄生,而膜孔菌科(Hymenopodidae)外发现一小群膜孔目分类群(GalinthiasStal、CongoharpaxLa Greca、PseudoharpaxSausure和HaragomantisKirby)。加勒比的EPaphroditaAudinet-Serville属也被发现,与传统上被归类的膜孔亚科EPaphroditinae的其他亚科相去甚远。恢复了放线菌亚科的非单系性,其中一些种嵌套在稻纵卷叶蜂亚科内,另一些种则嵌套在膜翅亚科内。我们提出了一个新的分类模式,其中包括一个提升的科和亚科(Galinthiadidae和Phyllocraniinae),两个恢复的部落(Anaxarchini和Otomantini),一个降级到亚科的科(Sibyllinae),一个新的从螳螂科转移过来的亚科(Phyllothelyinae),以及现有高级类群的新属名。我们使用我们的形态特征来产生对所有超属类群的广泛的重新描述以及特征诊断。我们提供了一个二分检索属的重要形态特征的例子插图,以及代表性标本的背部习性图像。
We present a suprageneric revision of the plant-mimicking mantis families Empusidae and Hymenopodidae on the basis of a total-evidence phylogenetic analysis with complete generic representation. We coded 124 characters from external morphology and used these together with a DNA dataset comprising ten gene fragments for an aligned matrix with 7514 nucleic acid sites to estimate phylogenetic relationships. We recovered largely congruent topologies across molecular, morphological and total evidence analyses. Empusidae and its assigned subfamilies were recovered as monophyletic. Hymenopodidae was recovered as paraphyletic with respect to Sibyllidae and Phyllothelyinae (Mantidae) whereas a small assemblage of hymenopodid taxa (GalinthiasStal, CongoharpaxLa Greca, PseudoharpaxSaussure and HarpagomantisKirby) were recovered outside the family. The Caribbean genus EpaphroditaAudinet-Serville was also recovered far from the rest of the hymenopodid subfamily Epaphroditinae, in which it is traditionally classified. The nonmonophyly of Acromantinae was recovered with some species nested within Oxypilinae and others found within Hymenopodinae. We present a new classification scheme that includes an elevated family and subfamily (Galinthiadidae and Phyllocraniinae), two reinstated tribes (Anaxarchini and Otomantini), a family demoted to subfamily rank (Sibyllinae), a newly assigned subfamily to Hymenopodidae transferred from Mantidae (Phyllothelyinae), and new generic assignments to existing higher-level groups. We used our morphological characters to produce extensive re-descriptions of all suprageneric groups as well as character diagnoses. We provide a dichotomous key to genera supported by example illustrations of important morphological features as well as dorsal habitus images of representative specimens.