Does the Muslim penalty in the British labour market dissipate after accounting for so-called "sociocultural attitudes"?

Does the Muslim penalty in the British labour market dissipate after accounting for so-called "sociocultural attitudes"?
复制标题

考虑到所谓的“社会文化态度”后,英国劳动力市场上的穆斯林惩罚是否会消失?

DOI:
10.1080/01419870.2022.2097887
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Sweida-Metwally S
Sweida-Metwally S
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sweida-Metwally S

文献摘要

相似文献

本文使用多层次模型,通过理解社会调查研究了男性和女性失业和不活跃的民族宗教惩罚。该文件证实了以前的穆斯林惩罚和英国劳动力市场按肤色(种族)和宗教(文化)分级的调查结果。然而,通过包括更大范围的族裔群体,该文件提供了一个纠正的帐户,在社会学文献中,是白色是不是一个保护免受穆斯林的惩罚。相反,虽然与穆斯林白色英国群体的联系似乎与惩罚无关,但发现传统上认同为白色的穆斯林阿拉伯人处于严重不利地位。这表明,穆斯林的惩罚也可能因一个人的原籍国而有所缓和。该文件还发现,即使在调整了所谓的“社会文化态度”之后,穆斯林仍然受到相当大的惩罚,这对价值取向为穆斯林惩罚提供了适当解释的假设提出了挑战。
Using multilevel modelling, this paper investigates ethno-religious penalties in unemployment and inactivity among men and women using the Understanding Society survey. The paper confirms previous findings of a Muslim penalty and a British labour market hierarchized by colour (ethnicity) and religion (culture). However, by including a greater range of ethnic groups the paper provides a corrective to accounts in the sociological literature that being White is not a protection against the Muslim penalty. Rather, while affiliation with the Muslim White British group does not appear to be associated with penalization, Muslim Arabs who traditionally identify as White are found to experience significant disadvantage. This suggests that the Muslim penalty might also be moderated by a person’s country of origin. The paper also finds that considerable penalties remain for Muslims even after adjusting for so-called “sociocultural attitudes”, challenging the assumption that value orientations offer a suitable explanation for the Muslim penalty.