Centering Indigenous knowledge in suicide prevention: a critical scoping review.
Centering Indigenous knowledge in suicide prevention: a critical scoping review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12889-022-14580-0
复制
发表时间：
2022-12-19
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
由于殖民化和持续边缘化所经历的集体和共同创伤，加拿大、美国、澳大利亚和新西兰的原住民自杀率极高。西方预防自杀的主流方法（通常涉及通过心理健康专业干预在个人层面努力改变行为）本身在很大程度上未能解决土著居民的自杀问题，这可能是由于文化与土著范式不一致。因此，许多原住民社区、组织和政府一直在采取更多基于文化和社区的方法来预防自杀。为了为未来的研究奠定基础并为这方面的预防工作提供信息，这项重要的范围界定审查总结了如何将土著方法纳入针对土著居民的自杀预防举措中。在 12 个学术文献电子书目数据库和 6 个灰色文献数据库中进行了以社区为基础的参与性研究 (CBPR) 方法引导的系统检索，以识别相关文章。通过搜索策略选择的文章参考列表是手工搜索的，以便包括可能遗漏的任何其他文章。文章经过筛选和资格评估。从符合条件的文章中提取数据，包括作者、发表年份、发表类型、研究目的、国家、目标人群、自杀预防策略类型、自杀预防策略描述以及研究主要结果。还应用了以梅蒂斯知识和实践为指导的主题分析方法来综合和总结研究结果。审查了 56 篇学术文章和 16 篇灰色文献文章。通过对学术和灰色文献的分析，得出了四个总体且交叉的主题领域：（1）参与文化并加强联系； (2) 整合土著知识； (3) 土著自决； (4)采用非殖民方法。研究结果表明，将土著知识和方法集中在自杀预防中如何积极促进自杀相关的结果。事实证明，基于全面的社区参与流程并纳入土著文化、知识和非殖民化方法的举措对个人和社区层面的自杀相关结果具有重大影响。本土预防自杀的方法多种多样，借鉴了当地文化、知识、需求和优先事项。在线版本包含可在 10.1186/s12889-022-14580-0 获取的补充材料。
Indigenous peoples of Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand experience disproportionately high rates of suicide as a result of the collective and shared trauma experienced with colonization and ongoing marginalization. Dominant, Western approaches to suicide prevention—typically involving individual-level efforts for behavioural change via mental health professional intervention—by themselves have largely failed at addressing suicide in Indigenous populations, possibly due to cultural misalignment with Indigenous paradigms. Consequently, many Indigenous communities, organizations and governments have been undertaking more cultural and community-based approaches to suicide prevention. To provide a foundation for future research and inform prevention efforts in this context, this critical scoping review summarizes how Indigenous approaches have been integrated in suicide prevention initiatives targeting Indigenous populations. A systematic search guided by a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach was conducted in twelve electronic bibliographic databases for academic literature and six databases for grey literature to identify relevant articles. the reference lists of articles that were selected via the search strategy were hand-searched in order to include any further articles that may have been missed. Articles were screened and assessed for eligibility. From eligible articles, data including authors, year of publication, type of publication, objectives of the study, country, target population, type of suicide prevention strategy, description of suicide prevention strategy, and main outcomes of the study were extracted. A thematic analysis approach guided by Métis knowledge and practices was also applied to synthesize and summarize the findings. Fifty-six academic articles and 16 articles from the grey literature were examined. Four overarching and intersecting thematic areas emerged out of analysis of the academic and grey literature: (1) engaging culture and strengthening connectedness; (2) integrating Indigenous knowledge; (3) Indigenous self-determination; and (4) employing decolonial approaches. Findings demonstrate how centering Indigenous knowledge and approaches within suicide prevention positively contribute to suicide-related outcomes. Initiatives built upon comprehensive community engagement processes and which incorporate Indigenous culture, knowledge, and decolonizing methods have been shown to have substantial impact on suicide-related outcomes at the individual- and community-level. Indigenous approaches to suicide prevention are diverse, drawing on local culture, knowledge, need and priorities. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14580-0.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1007/s11121-017-0798-9
发表时间：
2018-03
期刊：
Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research
影响因子：
--
作者：
Allen J;Rasmus SM;Fok CCT;Charles B;Henry D;Qungasvik Team
通讯作者：
Qungasvik Team
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Allen J;Mohatt G;Fok CC;Henry D;People Awakening Team
通讯作者：
People Awakening Team
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Armstrong, Gregory;Ironfield, Natalie;Jorm, Anthony F.
通讯作者：
Jorm, Anthony F.
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Ansloos, Jeffrey
通讯作者：
Ansloos, Jeffrey
DOI：
10.1016/j.rcp.2016.12.002
发表时间：
2017-12-01
期刊：
Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría
影响因子：
--
作者：
Azuero, Andres J.;Arreaza-Kaufman, Dan;Rosselli, Diego
通讯作者：
Rosselli, Diego