Using ecosystem services to identify inequitable outcomes in migratory species conservation
Using ecosystem services to identify inequitable outcomes in migratory species conservation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/conl.12920
复制
发表时间：
2022-09
影响因子：
8.5
通讯作者：
Charles C. Chester;Aaron M. Lien;J. Sundberg;J. Diffendorfer;Columba González‐Duarte;B. Mattsson;R. Medellín;D. Semmens;W. Thogmartin;J. J. Derbridge-J.;L. López-Hoffman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Charles C. Chester;Aaron M. Lien;J. Sundberg;J. Diffendorfer;Columba González‐Duarte;B. Mattsson;R. Medellín;D. Semmens;W. Thogmartin;J. J. Derbridge-J.;L. López-Hoffman
生物多样性保护工作因产生不公平的社会经济结果而受到批评。这些公平的挑战在很大程度上被分析为基于地方的问题，影响当地社区直接受到保护计划的影响。迁徙物种的保护在地理上扩大了这一问题，因为一个地方的人可能受益，而另一个地方的人则承担保护的成本。空间补贴的方法提供了一个有效的工具，分析这种关系的地方之间的迁徙物种。旨在量化整个迁徙物种范围内特定地点提供和接受的生态系统服务以及它们之间的差异，空间补贴方法突出了三个不平等轴：土著和定居者殖民社会之间，城市和农村人口之间，以及全球北方和全球南方之间。认识到这些关系对于实现两个相辅相成的政策目标至关重要：在保护迁徙物种的努力中避免不公平的保护结果，并确保迁徙物种的有效长期保护。在展示空间补贴方法如何能够识别和量化涉及三种迁徙物种（北方针尾鸭，帝王蝶和墨西哥无尾蝙蝠）的不公平性时，我们认为空间补贴方法可以适用于“生态系统服务付费”背景下的全球迁徙物种保护工作。
Biodiversity conservation efforts have been criticized for generating inequitable socio‐economic outcomes. These equity challenges are largely analyzed as place‐based problems affecting local communities directly impacted by conservation programs. The conservation of migratory species extends this problem geographically since people in one place may benefit while those in another bear the costs of conservation. The spatial subsidies approach offers an effective tool for analyzing such relationships between places connected by migratory species. Designed to quantify ecosystem services provided and received in specific locations across a migratory species’ range—and the disparities between them—the spatial subsidies approach highlights three axes of inequity: between indigenous and settler colonial societies, between urban and rural populations, and between the Global North and Global South. Recognizing these relationships is critical to achieving two mutually reinforcing policy goals: avoiding inequitable conservation outcomes in efforts to conserve migratory species, and ensuring effective long‐term conservation of migratory species. In demonstrating how the spatial subsidies approach enables the identification and quantification of inequities involving three migratory species (northern pintail ducks, monarch butterflies, and Mexican free‐tailed bats), we argue that a spatial subsidies approach could apply to migratory species conservation efforts worldwide under the context of “payments for ecosystem services.”