Exploring the relationship between plural values of nature, human well-being, and conservation and development intervention: Why it matters and how to do it?
Exploring the relationship between plural values of nature, human well-being, and conservation and development intervention: Why it matters and how to do it?
复制标题
探索自然多元价值、人类福祉以及保护和发展干预之间的关系：为什么重要以及如何去做？
DOI：
10.1002/pan3.10562
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
Carmenta R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carmenta R
在全球范围内，生物文化多样性的热带地区的陆地和海洋景观正处于过渡时期。受遥远的消费者的需求，全球环境变化的过程和众多的干预措施寻求气候，保护和发展的目标，这些过渡有可能影响的关系和多元性的价值观之间举行的人和places.This本文是一个综合的七个实证研究内的特殊功能（SF）：“什么是失去了过渡？捕捉保护和发展干预对热带地区关系价值和人类福祉的影响。通过两个开放论坛研讨会和批判性评论，投稿作者探索了SF论文中的紧急属性。确定了六个核心主题，并将其归入以下大类：㈠协调规模和复杂性的问题; ㈡为更多元地理解地貌变化的社会层面而需要克服的主要挑战; ㈢前进的道路：环境正义框架的潜力，以及可用于这样做的方法的实际概述。该综合解释了不同的领域和复杂的学术工作的关系价值观，影响评估中的人类福祉和去殖民化方法。它提供了一个实用和可操作的方法目录，在该领域的多元评价，并反映了他们的组合，优势和弱点，研究的贡献是政策相关的，因为它建立了一个更多元的干预设计和评估的方法是必不可少的，以实现更公正和可持续的未来，并强调了一些被认为是实现向传统实践过渡所必需的关键行动点。
Globally, land and seascapes across the bioculturally diverse tropics are in transition. Impacted by the demands of distant consumers, the processes of global environmental change and numerous interventions seeking climate, conservation and development goals, these transitions have the potential to impact the relationships and plurality of values held between people and place.This paper is a Synthesis of seven empirical studies within the Special Feature (SF): ‘What is lost in transition? Capturing the impacts of conservation and development interventions on relational values and human wellbeing in the tropics’. Through two Open Forum workshops, and critical review, contributing authors explored emergent properties across the papers of the SF. Six core themes were identified and are subsumed within broad categories of: (i) the problem of reconciling scale and complexity, (ii) key challenges to be overcome for more plural understanding of social dimensions of landscape change and (iii) ways forward: the potential of an environmental justice framework, and a practical overview of methods available to do so.The Synthesis interprets disparate fields and complex academic work on relational values, human well‐being and de‐colonial approaches in impact appraisal. It offers a practical and actionable catalogue of methods for plural valuation in the field, and reflects on their combinations, strengths and weaknesses.The research contribution is policy relevant because it builds the case for why a more plural approach in intervention design and evaluation is essential for achieving more just and sustainable futures, and highlights some of the key actions points deemed necessary to achieve such a transition to conventional practice.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.