Expertise in the age of post-factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies
Expertise in the age of post-factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008
复制
发表时间：
2017-08-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Bueger, Christian
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Berling, Trine Villumsen;Bueger, Christian
所谓的后事实政治对专业知识的作用提出了特别的挑战，呼吁一种新型的反思性，能够为政策的学术战略提供信息。以最近的“实践转向”的文献为出发点，我们主张引入一种“实践反思”的意识，可以为学者的实践提供指导。实践自反性关注学者的日常实践，而不是认识论的理想或正式的方法论规则。它引导我们注意学术和其他实践之间的关系。在这个结合点上，一些实际的挑战出现：我们讨论了三个主要的挑战，并确定他们作为认知，自主性和表演性的困境。为了寻求这些问题的答案，我们探讨了新葛兰西主义，布迪厄行为学和实用主义中概述的三种反身策略所提供的剧目。其结果是一个工具，重新思考学者的日常实践和非学术实践之间的关系，可能是有益的，在目前的情况下采用。
What has become known as post-factual politics poses particular challenges to the role of expertise, calling for a new type of reflexivity able to inform scholarly strategies towards policy. Taking recent literature on the `practice turn' as our point of departure, we argue for introducing a sense of 'practical reflexivity' that can provide guidance for the practice of scholars. Practical reflexivity focuses on the everyday practices of scholars rather than epistemic ideals or formal methodological rules. It directs our attention to the relation between academic and other practices. At this conjunction, several practical challenges arise: We discuss three major challenges and identify them as the epistemic, the autonomy and the performativity dilemmas. To seek answers to these, we explore the repertoire provided by three reflexive strategies outlined in neo-Gramscianism, Bourdieusian praxeology and pragmatism. The outcome is a tool for rethinking the relation between everyday practices of scholars and non-scholarly practices that may be usefully adopted in the current situation.