Comparison of tensile bond strength of resilient soft liners to denture base resins
Comparison of tensile bond strength of resilient soft liners to denture base resins
复制标题
弹性软衬垫与义齿基托树脂拉伸粘合强度的比较
DOI：
10.4103/0972-4052.16876
复制
发表时间：
2005
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Jabade
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Naik;J. Jabade
研究目的：确定三种市售软衬与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯义齿基托树脂的拉伸粘结强度，以帮助临床医生为患者选择衬垫，并在引入新材料时提供比较数据库。基本程序：在这项研究中，拉伸粘结试验被认为是调查和比较三种弹性衬里材料粘结强度的一种好方法，因为它提供了与材料拉伸强度相比的粘结强度信息。主要结论：SuperSoft（丙烯酸基内衬）的拉伸粘合强度优于Molloplast B（硅基内衬）和Mucopren（硅基内衬）。主要结论：本研究中使用的拉伸试验可有效评价和比较三种内衬的拉伸粘合强度。需要进一步研究加工方法、吸水性、粘合剂、顺应性变化、苛刻口腔环境中粘合强度变化以及材料化学等因素，以延长材料的使用寿命。
Purpose of the study: To determine the tensile bond strength of three commercially available soft liners to a polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin, to help the clinicians to select the liner for their patients, and to provide a comparative database when new materials are introduced. Basic procedures: In this study, tensile bond test was considered a good method of investigating and comparing the bond strength of three resilient lining materials, because it gives information on the strength of the bond in comparison to the tensile strength of the material. Main findings: The tensile bond strength of SuperSoft (acrylic-based liner) was better compared to Molloplast B (silicone-based liner) and Mucopren (silicone-based liner). Principle conclusion: The tensile test used in this study was effective in evaluating and comparing the tensile bond strength of the three liners. Factors such as processing methods, water sorption, bonding agents, changes in compliance, changes in the bond strength in the harsh oral environment, and chemistry of the material need further investigations to increase the serviceable life of the material.