Commentary on Tam and Zhou, 1996.
Commentary on Tam and Zhou, 1996.
复制标题
Tam 和 Zhou 的评论,1996。
DOI:
10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.02.006
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
2.7
通讯作者:
Soriano,Philippe
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Soriano,Philippe
For this commentary on classic papers published by Developmental Biology over the years, I chose to highlight this manuscript by Tam and Zhou (1996) on the plasticity of epiblast (EPI) cell contribution to the germ cell lineage in the mouse embryo. I teach this paper in my Developmental Biology class and students always love it.It had been known for some time that single EPI cells transplanted from one preimplantation embryo to another could give rise to both primordial germ cells (PGCs) and somatic tissues (Gardner, 1968). Following implantation into the uterus however, heroic fate mapping experiments using dye injections indicated that only EPI cells neighboring the extraembryonic ectoderm (ExE) could give rise to PGCs, raising the possibility that these cells might be induced by an extraembryonic signal (Lawson and Hage, 1994). In this important paper, Tam and Zhou (1996) addressed the issue conclusively, by performing technically challenging transplantation experiments in gastrulating embryos. They found that distal EPI cells, far removed from the ExE, could form PGCs when transferred to a proximal location. Conversely, proximal EPI cells transplanted to a distal site generally did not form germ cells. These experiments indicated that EPI cells are plastic with respect to cell fate and depend on their localization in the embryo to form PGCs. This, in turn, strongly suggested that PGCs are formed at this stage through an induction process in response to a signal from the ExE. The paper was quite influential and had a marked impact on the field, as it set the stage for the search for such an inducer, subsequently shown to be BMP signaling (Lawson et al., 1999).