The effects of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program on preschool children with co-occurring disruptive behavior and attentional/hyperactive difficulties
The effects of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program on preschool children with co-occurring disruptive behavior and attentional/hyperactive difficulties
复制标题
DOI：
10.1023/a:1020807613155
复制
发表时间：
2002-12-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Markie-Dadds, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bor, W;Sanders, MR;Markie-Dadds, C
行为家庭干预（BFI）项目的两种变体（Triple P）对87名同时存在破坏性行为和注意力/多动障碍的学龄前儿童进行了比较。家庭被随机分配到增强BFI (EBFI)，标准BFI （SBFI）或等候名单（WL）对照组。在干预后，与WL条件相比，BFI方案与父母报告的儿童行为问题水平显著降低、父母功能失调水平降低以及父母能力提高相关。与WL相比，EBFI条件也与观察到的儿童消极行为显著减少有关。干预后取得的进展在1年随访中保持不变。与预测相反，在干预后或随访中，使用任何结果测量都没有显示增强方案优于标准方案。每个项目都显著减少了儿童同时发生的破坏性行为和注意力/多动困难，从干预前到随访，80%的儿童在观察到的消极行为方面表现出临床可靠的改善。
Two variants of a behavioral family intervention (BFI) program known as Triple P were compared using 87 preschoolers with co-occurring disruptive behavior and attentional/hyperactive difficulties. Families were randomly allocated to enhanced BFI (EBFI), standard BFI (SBFI), or a waitlist (WL) control group. At postintervention both BFI programs were associated with significantly lower levels of parent-reported child behavior problems, lower levels of dysfunctional parenting, and greater parental competence than the WL condition. The EBFI condition was also associated with significantly less observed child negative behavior in comparison to the WL. The gains achieved at postintervention were maintained at 1-year follow-up. Contrary to predictions, the enhanced program was not shown to be superior to the standard program using any of the outcome measures at either postintervention or follow-up. Each of the programs produced significant reductions in children's co-occurring disruptive behavior and attentional/hyperactive difficulties with 80% of the children showing clinically reliable improvement in observed negative behavior from preintervention to follow-up.