A Defense of The Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm
A Defense of The Counterfactual Comparative Account of Harm
复制标题
对危害的反事实比较解释的辩护
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Klocksiem
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Klocksiem
伤害常被认为具有特殊的道德意义。看来我们最基本的道德义务之一就是避免伤害他人--某些行为会造成或构成伤害，这是反对实施它的一个强有力的道德理由。例如，密尔认为，伤害具有核心的政治重要性：只有当我们伤害我们的同胞时，国家才有理由干涉我们的活动。根据罗斯的说法，非男性的责任是正确的规范性伦理理论的关键部分;他声称米尔（1978，第100页）。11 - 2）。Ross（1933），pp. 21 - 2）。
Harm has often been thought to have particular moral signi cance. It seems that one of our primary moral obligations is to refrain from harming others—that some action would cause or constitute a harm is a strong moral reason against performing it. According to J. S. Mill, for example, harm is of central political importance: the state is justi ed in interfering with our activities only if we would harm our fellow creatures. And according to Ross, the duty of non-male cence is a crucial part of the correct normative ethical theory; he claims Mill (1978, pp. 11 – 2). Ross (1933, pp. 21 – 2).