Safeguarding Justice Research
Safeguarding Justice Research
复制标题
维护正义研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Jasso
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Jasso
人们认为什么是正义？公正研究的一个基本要素是公正的报酬观察者对某个特定的受报酬者的公正的看法。但辨别公正的回报并不容易;在想法和表达之间有很多东西。正义理论提出了四类措施，一类是直接措施，三类是间接措施，每一类措施都包括数据收集和数据分析的几种设计。本文考察了直接设计和三种间接设计中的一类--基于公平评价的间接设计，并重新审视了基于公平评价的间接设计长期面临的挑战，即减少或消除实际报酬与未观察到的公平报酬之间的相关性。本文提出了统计，代数和经验证据，以显示析因调查，其层的随机化，防止偏见，减轻相关性在一个奖励设计和破坏它在多个奖励设计。当然，寻求更好的措施仍在继续。正如长度和重量一样，新理论和新技术将带来新的和更好的公正奖励措施。
What do people think is just? A basic element in justice research is the just reward–the observer’s idea about what is just for a particular rewardee. But discerning the just reward is not easy; much intervenes between the idea and its expression. Justice theory suggests four classes of measures, one direct and three indirect, each class encompassing several designs for data collection and data analysis. This paper examines direct designs and one of the three classes of indirect designs–that based on the justice evaluation–and revisits the longstanding challenge of justice-evaluation-based indirect designs, namely, to reduce or eliminate the correlation between the actual reward and the unobserved just reward. The paper presents statistical, algebraic, and empirical evidence to show how the factorial survey, with its layers of randomization, protects against bias, mitigating the correlation in the one-reward design and destroying it in the multiple-reward design. Of course, the search for better measures continues. As with length and weight, new theory and new technology will bring new and better measures of the just reward.