The future of leadership research?

The future of leadership research?
复制标题

领导力研究的未来?

DOI:
10.1080/13632430802145902
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Gunter H
Gunter H
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gunter H

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

学校的有效领导是一个新兴领域,它是最近关于国家、公共政策和知识之间关系的政策战略的产物。本文认为,这正在产生一种集中的品牌有效领导形式,用于委托和交付条款,这对于进一步将市场扩展到公共教育至关重要。因此,领导力研究的未来与知识生产的技术形式直接相关,这种技术形式为正在进行的改革提供证据。虽然情况看起来令人沮丧,但作者研究了那些相信教育领导力研究的人用来挑战和产生替代方案的策略。他们主张从事智力工作,成为一名公共知识分子,这样,“算作”领导力和良好实践研究的东西就会受到挑战和质疑,这些挑战和质疑既反对又为根深蒂固的公共服务方面的保守利益提供了替代方案。
There is an emergent field of effective leadership of schools that is the product of recent policy strategies regarding the relationship between the state, public policy and knowledge. It is argued in this paper that this is producing a centralised branded form of effective leadership for the commissioning and delivery of provision that is essential to the further extension of the market into public education. Consequently, the future of leadership research is related directly to a technical form of knowledge production that produces evidence to support ongoing reform. While the situation looks gloomy the authors examine strategies for those who believe in educational leadership research to use to both challenge and to generate alternatives. They argue for doing intellectual work and being a public intellectual so that what ‘counts’ as leadership and good practice research is challenged and questioned in ways that both counter and provide alternatives to deeply entrenched conservative interests regarding public services.
2000 年之后:有效性和改进的下一步在哪里?
DOI: --
发表时间: 2001
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
L. Stoll;J. Macbeath;P. Mortimore;J. Macbeath
通讯作者: J. Macbeath
DOI: --
发表时间: 2006
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Christopher Rhodes;M. Brundrett
通讯作者: M. Brundrett
捷克共和国的教育私有化
DOI: --
发表时间: 2000
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Švecová
通讯作者: J. Švecová
DOI: --
发表时间: 2000
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Deanne Fishbourne
通讯作者: Deanne Fishbourne
DOI: 10.1016/s1048-9843(00)00059-x
发表时间: 2000-12
影响因子: 7.5
作者:
Kevin B. Lowe;W. Gardner
通讯作者: Kevin B. Lowe;W. Gardner