DIET@NET: Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment in health research.
DIET@NET: Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment in health research.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12916-017-0962-x
复制
发表时间：
2017-11-15
期刊：
影响因子：
9.3
通讯作者：
DIET@NET consortium
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cade JE;Warthon-Medina M;Albar S;Alwan NA;Ness A;Roe M;Wark PA;Greathead K;Burley VJ;Finglas P;Johnson L;Page P;Roberts K;Steer T;Hooson J;Greenwood DC;Robinson S;DIET@NET consortium
膳食评估是复杂的，需要在流行病学研究中选择最合适的膳食评估工具(DAT)的策略。膳食评估工具网络(dioet@net)旨在利用自我报告就膳食评估的最佳做法指南(BPG)达成专家共识。BPG是使用Delphi技术开发的。进行了两次德尔菲回合。总共邀请了131名专家，其中65名被接受，其中48名完成了德尔福第一轮，51名完成了德尔福第二轮。总共有57名来自北美、欧洲、亚洲和澳大利亚的专家对47项建议的指南发表了意见。编制了43份指南，分为以下四个阶段：第一阶段定义了什么是根据饮食摄入量来衡量的(什么？谁?以及何时？)；阶段II。调查不同类型的DAT；阶段III。通过评估已发表的验证研究来评估现有工具以选择最合适的DAT；阶段IV。仔细考虑所选DAT的实施情况，并考虑潜在偏差的来源。Delphi技术综合了专家对评估饮食摄入量的最佳实践的意见。BPG为健康研究人员为他们的研究选择最合适的饮食评估方法提供了宝贵的指导。这些指南可通过营养工具网站www.nutritools.org获取。本文的在线版本(doi：10.1186/s12916-0170962-x)包含补充材料，授权用户可以使用。
Dietary assessment is complex, and strategies to select the most appropriate dietary assessment tool (DAT) in epidemiological research are needed. The DIETary Assessment Tool NETwork (DIET@NET) aimed to establish expert consensus on Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) for dietary assessment using self-report. The BPGs were developed using the Delphi technique. Two Delphi rounds were conducted. A total of 131 experts were invited, and of these 65 accepted, with 48 completing Delphi round I and 51 completing Delphi round II. In all, a total of 57 experts from North America, Europe, Asia and Australia commented on the 47 suggested guidelines. Forty-three guidelines were generated, grouped into the following four stages: Stage I. Define what is to be measured in terms of dietary intake (what? who? and when?); Stage II. Investigate different types of DATs; Stage III. Evaluate existing tools to select the most appropriate DAT by evaluating published validation studies; Stage IV. Think through the implementation of the chosen DAT and consider sources of potential biases. The Delphi technique consolidated expert views on best practice in assessing dietary intake. The BPGs provide a valuable guide for health researchers to choose the most appropriate dietary assessment method for their studies. These guidelines will be accessible through the Nutritools website, www.nutritools.org. The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0962-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
37.8
作者：
Cobb, Laura K.;Anderson, Cheryl A. M.;Appel, Lawrence J.
通讯作者：
Appel, Lawrence J.
影响因子：
7.1
作者：
BLOCK, G;HARTMAN, AM
通讯作者：
HARTMAN, AM
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Bognar, A.;Piekarski, J.
通讯作者：
Piekarski, J.
影响因子：
5.8
作者：
Bazzano, Lydia A;Serdula, Mary K;Liu, Simin
通讯作者：
Liu, Simin
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Aldwairji, Maryam A.;Chu, Jin;Orfila, Caroline
通讯作者：
Orfila, Caroline