Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity.
Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1049732314557084
复制
发表时间：
2016-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Wallerstein N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Belone L;Lucero JE;Duran B;Tafoya G;Baker EA;Chan D;Chang C;Greene-Moton E;Kelley MA;Wallerstein N
一个全国性的社区参与性研究小组开发了一个社区参与性研究伙伴关系的概念/逻辑模型，以了解伙伴关系进程对提高社区能力和健康成果的贡献。该模型主要通过学术文献和专家共识的建立来开发，我们寻求社区的投入来评估表面有效性和可接受性。我们的研究团队在全国范围内与六个合作伙伴进行了半结构化的焦点小组。与会者验证和扩大现有的模型结构，并确定了新的结构的基础上“现实世界”的实践，从而修订模型。确定了四个贯穿各领域的结构：发展信任、能力、相互学习和权力动态。通过实证检验模型，我们发现社区的面子效度和能力，以适应不同的情况下的模型。我们建议伙伴关系使用和调整CBPR模型及其结构，进行集体反思和评估，以加强他们的伙伴关系实践，实现他们的健康和研究目标。
A national community based participatory research (CBPR) team developed a conceptual/logic model of CBPR partnerships to understand the contribution of partnership processes to improved community capacity and health outcomes. With the model primarily developed through academic literature and expert consensus-building, we sought community input to assess face validity and acceptability. Our research team conducted semi-structured focus groups with six partnerships nation-wide. Participants validated and expanded upon existing model constructs and identified new constructs based on “real-world” praxis, resulting in a revised model. Four cross-cutting constructs were identified: trust development, capacity, mutual learning, and power dynamics. By empirically testing the model, we found community face validity and capacity to adapt the model to diverse contexts. We recommend partnerships use and adapt the CBPR model and its constructs, for collective reflection and evaluation, to enhance their partnering practices and achieve their health and research goals.