Maturing Early-Stage Biomedical Research; Proof of Concept Program Objectives, Decision Making and Preliminary Performance at the University of Colorado.

Maturing Early-Stage Biomedical Research; Proof of Concept Program Objectives, Decision Making and Preliminary Performance at the University of Colorado.
复制标题

成熟的早期生物医学研究;

DOI:
10.1097/01.mnb.0000357626.97020.e5
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
Medical innovation & business
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Traystman,RichardJ
Traystman,RichardJ
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Silva,Rick;Allen,DavidN;Traystman,RichardJ

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这份手稿的重点是组织目标,决策标准和生物医学技术商业化计划的性能作为理解大学技术成熟计划的背景。主要的论点是,大学技术成熟计划是从公共和私人的技术开发计划没有什么不同的种类,这些更广泛的计划的区别主要是一个不同的程度相关的大学研究context.The大学的科罗拉多(CU)的整体概念验证(POC)的资助过程中开发了三个不同的程序。虽然CU POC计划涉及大学技术的所有领域,但本手稿数据将从仅与生物医学技术相关的三个计划要素(治疗,诊断,医疗设备以及较小程度上的工具和材料)中呈现。为了了解CU的POC计划的目标,决策标准和性能,重要的是要了解该计划是如何发展和演变的。结论的形式提供的经验教训,大学技术转让实践的影响。关于该主题的主要工作是描述性的,主要来自从业者报告和宣传文献(约翰逊,2005年)。
This manuscript focuses on organizational objectives, decision criteria and performance of biomedical technology commercialization programs as a context for understanding university technology maturation programs. The primary contention is that university technology maturation programs are not different in kind from public and private technology development programs, and the difference from these broader programs is primarily a difference of degree related to aspects of the university research context.The University of Colorado (CU) has developed three different programs within its overall Proof of Concept (POC) funding process. Although the CU POC program relates to all areas of university technology, for this manuscript data will be presented from three program elements solely related to biomedical technologies (therapeutics, diagnostics, medical devices and to a lesser extent, tools and materials). In order to understand the objectives, decision criteria and performance of CU’s POC programs, it is important to understand how the program developed and evolved. Conclusions are provided in the form of lessons learned, and implications for university technology transfer practice. The main work on the topic is descriptive and primarily derived from practitioner reports and promotional literature (Johnson, 2005).