Taxonomy and systematics of tetraodontiform fishes: a review focusing primarily on progress in the period from 1980 to 2014
Taxonomy and systematics of tetraodontiform fishes: a review focusing primarily on progress in the period from 1980 to 2014
复制标题
四齿鱼的分类学和系统学：主要关注 1980 年至 2014 年期间进展的回顾
DOI：
10.1007/s10228-014-0444-5
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
K. Matsuura
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
小宮 あゆみ,阿部 淳,川井 絢子,鈴木 穣,豊田 敦,藤山 秋佐夫,大槻 涼,土金 勇樹;西山 智明,関本 弘之;Ryohei Kanzaki;K. Matsuura
1981年在悉尼召开第一届印度太平洋鱼类会议（IPFC1）时，除了最近评述的三棘科（Triacanthodidae）和三棘科（Triacanthidae）外，所有四齿兽科的属级和种级分类还存在许多问题。IPFC1 ~ IPFC9（1981 ~ 2013）是四齿形动物分类学和系统学研究取得重大进展的时期：发表了许多关于不同属和种的综述和修订论文，描述了许多主要发生在珊瑚礁和热带淡水中的新分类群；形态学特征的分支分析已被用于阐明各科的系统发育关系，分子分析已取得很大进展，可提供科、属甚至种的详细系统发育关系。本文综述了四齿形动物分类学和系统学的发展，重点介绍了自1980年以来（James C. Tyler的巨著发表之时）到ipfc时期的研究成果，包括1980年以前的相关出版物。本文对现存四齿形目10科412种进行了鉴定，其种属分配如下：三棘蝗科包括11属23种，三棘蝗科4属7种，棘蝗科12属37种，棘蝗科27属102种，蜘蛛科6属13种，介形虫科5属22种，单型棘蝗科、四棘蝗科27属184种，棘蝗科7属18种，棘蝗科3属5种。这些科的系统发育关系通过形态学和分子分析得到了明确，并提供了很好的支持的姐妹关系：三棘科和三棘科，Balistidae和Monacanthidae， Tetraodontidae和didontidae。然而，由于形态学和分子研究中不同位置的冲突（例如，Molidae在分子研究中被不同地放置），齿类科和Molidae的系统发育位置仍然存在问题。
When the first Indo-Pacific Fish Conference (IPFC1) was held in Sydney in 1981, there were still many problems in the generic- and species-level taxonomy of all tetraodontiform families except for the recently reviewed Triacanthodidae and Triacanthidae. The period from IPFC1 to IPFC9 (1981−2013) was a time of great progress in the taxonomy and systematics of the Tetraodontiformes: many review and revisional papers have been published for various genera and species, with descriptions of many new taxa occurring mainly on coral reefs and in tropical freshwaters; and cladistic analyses of morphological characters have been performed to clarify phylogenetic relationships of various families and molecular analyses have greatly progressed to provide detailed phylogenetic relationships of families, genera, and even species. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review on developments in the taxonomy and systematics of the Tetraodontiformes, focusing primarily on contributions since 1980 (when James C. Tyler’s monumental work was published) through the period of IPFCs, including pertinent publications before 1980. This paper recognizes 412 extant species in the 10 families of living Tetraodontiformes, with the allocation of species and genera as follows: Triacanthodidae including 23 species in 11 genera, Triacanthidae seven species in four genera, Balistidae 37 species in 12 genera, Monacanthidae 102 species in 27 genera, Aracanidae 13 species in six genera, Ostraciidae 22 species in five genera, Triodontidae monotypic, Tetraodontidae 184 species in 27 genera, Diodontidae 18 species in seven genera, and Molidae five species in three genera. Phylogenetic relationships of the families have been clarified by morphological and molecular analyses and have provided well-supported sister relationships of the families: Triacanthodidae and Triacanthidae, Balistidae and Monacanthidae, and Tetraodontidae and Diodontidae. However, there remain problems with the phylogenetic positions of the Triodontidae and Molidae due to conflicts of differing positions in morphological and molecular studies (e.g., Molidae has been placed differently among molecular studies).