Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology Shapes Asylum Seekers' Immigration Policy Attitudes in Israel and Australia.
Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology Shapes Asylum Seekers' Immigration Policy Attitudes in Israel and Australia.
复制标题
威胁还是威胁？
DOI：
10.1093/jrs/few012
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Hall,BrianJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Canetti,Daphna;Snider,KerenLG;Pedersen,Anne;Hall,BrianJ
不同的政治意识形态能否解释对寻求庇护者的政策偏好？我们专注于政府对外群体成员的政策的态度，并建议，威胁的看法有助于塑造这些政策的态度。研究1比较了公众舆论在以色列（N= 137）和澳大利亚（N= 138），两个国家的庇护政策，限制性的庇护政策，谁主机大量的寻求庇护者;研究2，纵向研究，在两个不同的时间段在以色列进行之前和加沙冲突期间。这两项研究的结果表明，外群体成员的威胁感驱动保守的政治意识形态和公民之间的排斥性庇护政策的支持之间的关系。东道国成员（内群体）对寻求庇护者（外群体）的威胁感可能影响政策的制定。在考虑以色列和澳大利亚对寻求庇护者的政策时，需要认真权衡这些外来群体威胁的影响。
Can different political ideologies explain policy preferences regarding asylum seekers? We focus on attitudes regarding governmental policy towards out-group members and suggest that perceptions of threat help to shape these policy attitudes. Study 1 compared public opinion regarding asylum policy in Israel (N= 137) and Australia (N= 138), two countries with restrictive asylum policies and who host a large number of asylum seekers; Study 2, a longitudinal study, was conducted during two different time periods in Israel—before and during the Gaza conflict. Results of both studies showed that threat perceptions of out-group members drive the relationship between conservative political ideologies and support for exclusionary asylum policies among citizens. Perceptions of threat held by members of the host country (the in-group) towards asylum seekers (the out-group) may influence policy formation. The effect of these out-groups threats needs to be critically weighed when considering Israeli and Australian policies towards asylum seekers.