Is it me or us? The impact of individual and collective participation on work engagement and burnout in a cluster-randomized organisational intervention
Is it me or us? The impact of individual and collective participation on work engagement and burnout in a cluster-randomized organisational intervention
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02678373.2021.1889072
复制
发表时间：
2021-02-17
期刊：
影响因子：
6.1
通讯作者：
Sanz-Vergel, Ana
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nielsen, Karina;Antino, Mirko;Sanz-Vergel, Ana
在实施组织干预措施时，通常建议参与，但是，了解参与如何工作仍然研究不足。在采用等待名单控制设计的集群随机对照干预中，我们探讨了对个人或集体参与的看法是否对参与性组织干预的结果产生最大影响;工作参与度和倦怠。我们在丹麦邮政服务（N = 330）进行了研究。使用多层次的分析，我们发现，个人参与的看法预测工作参与和减少倦怠干预后的改善，然而，这些关系变得不显着后，包括集体参与过程的一部分，在模型中的看法。我们的研究结果增加了对参与作用的理解，特别是对集体参与式干预过程的看法，在确保干预措施实现预期结果方面发挥作用。
Participation is generally recommended when implementing organisational interventions, however, understanding how participation works remains understudied. In a cluster-randomised, controlled intervention employing a wait-list control design, we explore whether perceptions of individual or collective participation had the greatest impact on a participatory organisational intervention's outcomes; work engagement and burnout. We conducted the study in the Danish postal service (N = 330). Using multi-level analyses, we found that perceptions of individual participation predicted improvements in work engagement and reductions in burnout post-intervention, however, these relationships became non-significant after including perceptions of being part of a collective participatory process in the model. Our findings add to the understanding of the role participation and in particular, perceptions of a collective participatory intervention process, plays in ensuring interventions achieve their intended outcomes.