The second assessment of the SCOOT system in Nijmegen
The second assessment of the SCOOT system in Nijmegen
复制标题
奈梅亨SCOOT系统第二次评估
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Dibbits
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Taale;W. Fransen;J. Dibbits
Middelham等人讨论了奈梅亨SCOOT系统的实施和第一次评估。(1994)和Middelham et al.(1995年)。该系统的实施是成功的，将40个十字路口置于SCOOT控制之下。第一次评估显示，在旅行时间、停靠点和排队长度方面，SCOOT系统并不比旧的固定时间协调控制计划更好或更差。其中一个结论是，对于一些链路，SCOOT对时延的估计与测量的时延有很大差异。出于这些原因，交通、公共工程和水管理部交通研究中心决定，为了减少网络的一部分，对SCOOT系统进行第二次验证和评估。这项工作委托给了德文特的Witteveen+Bos咨询工程师。本文对第二次验证和评估进行了描述，给出了结果并得出了结论。
The implementation and first assessment of the SCOOT system in Nijmegen have been discussed by Middelham et al. (1994) and again Middelham et al. (1995). The implementation of the system was successful, bringing 40 intersections under SCOOT control. The first assessment showed that the SCOOT system was not better or worse than the old, fixed-time, coordinated control plans, in terms of travel time, stops and queue lengths. One of the conclusions was that for some links the estimation of delay by SCOOT differed significantly from the measured delay. For these reasons the Transport Research Centre of the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management decided, for a reduced part of the network, to validate and assess the SCOOT system for the second time. The work was commissioned to Witteveen+Bos Consulting Engineers in Deventer. In this paper the second validation and assessment are described, results are given and conclusions are drawn.