Age-dependent electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns during sevoflurane general anesthesia in infants.
Age-dependent electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns during sevoflurane general anesthesia in infants.
复制标题
婴儿七氟硫素全身麻醉期间年龄依赖性的脑电图(EEG)模式。
DOI:
10.7554/elife.06513
复制
发表时间:
2015-06-23
期刊:
影响因子:
7.7
通讯作者:
Berde CB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cornelissen L;Kim SE;Purdon PL;Brown EN;Berde CB
Electroencephalogram (EEG) approaches may provide important information about developmental changes in brain-state dynamics during general anesthesia. We used multi-electrode EEG, analyzed with multitaper spectral methods and video recording of body movement to characterize the spatio-temporal dynamics of brain activity in 36 infants 0–6 months old when awake, and during maintenance of and emergence from sevoflurane general anesthesia. During maintenance: (1) slow-delta oscillations were present in all ages; (2) theta and alpha oscillations emerged around 4 months; (3) unlike adults, all infants lacked frontal alpha predominance and coherence. Alpha power was greatest during maintenance, compared to awake and emergence in infants at 4–6 months. During emergence, theta and alpha power decreased with decreasing sevoflurane concentration in infants at 4–6 months. These EEG dynamic differences are likely due to developmental factors including regional differences in synaptogenesis, glucose metabolism, and myelination across the cortex. We demonstrate the need to apply age-adjusted analytic approaches to develop neurophysiologic-based strategies for pediatric anesthetic state monitoring. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06513.001 Every year about 200,000 infants in the United States are given general anesthesia during their first year of life. Though anesthesia is essential to control pain during surgery and other medical procedures on infants, it involves some risks. There are some controversial studies suggesting that repeated anesthetics early in life may impact how the brain develops, but other studies have been reassuring and found no such effects. To reduce the risks, doctors carefully monitor infants' blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, and oxygen levels while they are receiving anesthesia. Electroencephalograms (EEGs) have proven to be a useful tool for monitoring the brain activity of adults undergoing anesthesia, but studies have found EEG-based monitoring to be unreliable in infants under anesthesia. A more reliable method of monitoring the brains of infants during anesthesia is needed. Anesthesiologists nevertheless need to better understand how the infant's brain works under general anesthesia, and novel EEG techniques hold promise for monitoring brain well-being and for adjusting anesthetic dosing in infants of different ages. Differences in the way infants' brains respond to anesthesia may explain why current EEG-based monitoring methods developed for adults don't work as well in infants as in adults. Now, Cornelissen, Kim et al. have used a new EEG-based approach to demonstrate that as infants' brains develop, their responses to anesthesia change. The experiments involved 36 infants aged up to six months old who were going through routine surgical procedures. The brain activity of the infants was recorded using EEG—via electrodes placed on their scalps—when they were awake, during anesthesia, and as they recovered afterwards. The infants were videoed at the same time. Comparing the video with the EEG recordings allowed the brain activity of the infants to be matched up with their state of consciousness. Cornelissen, Kim et al. detected slow waves of brain activity across the entire scalp of infants who are under six months old and under anesthesia. Infants who are older than about four months old also display some faster brain waves, which decreased in power as the infants emerged from anesthesia. However, none of the infants has the same pattern seen in adults—where faster waves appear near the front of the brain. These findings may help scientists develop more reliable ways to monitor infants' brains during anesthesia. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06513.002