Robustness, Diversity of Evidence, and Probabilistic Independence
Robustness, Diversity of Evidence, and Probabilistic Independence
复制标题
稳健性、证据多样性和概率独立性
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-23015-3_23
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
J. Schupbach
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Schupbach
在稳健性分析中，假设的支持程度取决于结果证明的稳健性，而结果的稳健程度取决于我们以不同的方式检测它。但是，究竟是什么样的多样性在起作用呢？在本文中，我表明，证据多样性的正式解释最经常呼吁在工作中的鲁棒性-这一切都以这样或那样的方式提请概率独立性-未能阐明的概念多样性相关的鲁棒性分析。最后，我简要概述了一个有前途的替代方法的启发Horwich的（概率和证据。剑桥大学出版社，剑桥，1982）证据多样性的排除性解释。
In robustness analysis, hypotheses are supported to the extent that a result proves robust, and a result is robust to the extent that we detect it in diverse ways. But what precise sense of diversity is at work here? In this paper, I show that the formal explications of evidential diversity most often appealed to in work on robustness – which all draw in one way or another on probabilistic independence – fail to shed light on the notion of diversity relevant to robustness analysis. I close by briefly outlining a promising alternative approach inspired by Horwich’s (Probability and evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982) eliminative account of evidential diversity.
联合效应：鲁棒性的新证据。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
The American journal of psychology.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Stolarz-Fantino,Stephanie;Fantino,Edmund;Zizzo,DanielJ;Wen,Julie
通讯作者：
Wen,Julie