Monte Carlo Study of Quantitative Electron Probe Microanalysis of Monazite with a Coating Film: Comparison of 25 nm Carbon and 10 nm Gold at E0= 15 and 25 keV

Monte Carlo Study of Quantitative Electron Probe Microanalysis of Monazite with a Coating Film: Comparison of 25 nm Carbon and 10 nm Gold at E0= 15 and 25 keV
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1751-908x.2007.00852.x
复制
发表时间:
2007-06
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Takenori Kato
Takenori Kato
中科院分区:
地球科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Takenori Kato

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

碳(厚度为25-30 nm)是地质样品的电子探针显微分析(EPMA)中最常用的涂层材料。在特殊情况下,也可以使用金涂层来减少电子轰击对表面的损伤。MonteCarlo模拟已经进行了独居石与25 nm的碳和10 nm的金涂层,以了解在定量EPMA在E0= 15 keV和25 keV的涂层膜的效果。模拟表明,碳涂层独居石在独居石中产生的X射线的深度分布与未涂层独居石相同,而金涂层独居石产生了扭曲的深度分布。在40度的X射线发射角下,10 nm的金涂层在独居石和纯钍之间的k比率比25 nm的碳涂层高1.06(15 keV)和1.05(25 keV)倍。因此,10 nm的金涂层是导致独居石定量EPMA不准确的可能因素,而25 nm的碳涂层没有显著影响。
Carbon (25–30 nm in thickness) is the most common coating material used in the electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) of geological samples. A gold coating is also used in special cases to reduce the surface damage by electron bombardment. Monte Carlo simulations have been performed for monazite with a 25 nm carbon and a 10 nm gold coating to understand the effect of a coating film in quantitative EPMA at E0= 15 keV and 25 keV. Simulations showed that carbon‐coated monazite gave the same depth distribution of the generated X‐rays in the monazite as uncoated monazite, whilst gold‐coated monazite gave a distorted depth distribution. A 10 nm gold coating was 1.06 (15 keV) and 1.05 (25 keV) times higher in k‐ratio between monazite and pure thorium than a 25 nm carbon coating at an X‐ray take‐off angle of 40 degrees. Thus, a 10 nm gold coating is a possible factor contributing to inaccuracy in quantitative EPMA of monazite, while a 25 nm carbon coating does not have a significant effect.