Face-to-Face, Hybrid, or Online?: Issues Faculty Face Redesigning an Introductory Engineering Graphics Course
Face-to-Face, Hybrid, or Online?: Issues Faculty Face Redesigning an Introductory Engineering Graphics Course
复制标题
面对面、混合还是在线？：教师在重新设计入门工程图形课程时面临的问题
DOI：
10.18260/1-2--3729
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Wiebe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Branoff;E. Wiebe
2007年秋季学期，在三个笔记本电脑部分（即，所有学生都拥有笔记本电脑，每天都带着笔记本电脑来上课。课程的在线部分包括内容演示、软件演示、草图示例以及在线评估。每周一次在教室里开会，教师讨论和演示基本的CAD和教科书内容。这段时间也被用来回答学生的问题，并对家庭作业和CAD练习给予反馈。在课堂之外，学生们需要查看在线内容，完成CAD和素描练习，并完成每周的在线评估。混合组和面授组的期末考试成绩没有差异。本文讨论了混合工程图学入门课程的实施，总结了2007年秋季学期试点研究期间收集的数据，并提供了一些关于面对面，混合和所有在线交付的相对优势和劣势的讨论。
A hybrid introductory course was developed and piloted during the Fall 2007 semester in three laptop sections (i.e., all of the students owned and brought laptops to class each day). The online portion of the course included voiced-over content presentations, software demonstrations, and sketching examples as well as online assessments. Sections met in the classroom once each week where instructors discussed and demonstrated essential CAD and textbook content. This time was also used to answer student questions and give feedback on homework and CAD exercises. Outside of class, students were expected to view the online content, complete CAD and sketching exercises, and complete a weekly online assessment. No difference was found between final exam scores in the hybrid sections and the face-to-face sections. This paper discusses the implementation of the hybrid introductory engineering graphics course, summarizes data collected during the Fall 2007 semester pilot study, and offers some discussions about the relative advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face, hybrid, and all online delivery.