2-COMPONENT MODELS OF SOCIALLY DESIRABLE RESPONDING
2-COMPONENT MODELS OF SOCIALLY DESIRABLE RESPONDING
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
复制
发表时间：
1984-01-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
PAULHUS, DL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
PAULHUS, DL
J. Millham 和 LI Jacobson (1978) 基于否认和归因成分的社会期望响应的二因素模型进行了回顾和争议。审查了区分自欺欺人和印象管理成分的第二个模型，并证明其与愿望量表的早期因素分析工作相关。我们对 511 名本科生进行了两项研究来测试该模型。对常用意愿量表（例如MMPI的谎言量表、马洛-克罗恩社会意愿量表）的因素分析表明，这两个主要因素最好解释为自我欺骗和印象管理。第二项研究采用验证性因素分析，表明归因/否认模型以及自欺欺人/印象管理模型都不适合数据。第三项研究的得分为 100 S，在匿名和公开条件下比较了意愿量表的分数。结果显示，那些在印象管理因素上负载最高的量表显示出从匿名到公开条件的平均增幅最大。建议在个性自我报告中控制印象管理，而不是自我欺骗。（54 参考）（PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA，保留所有权利）
J. Millham and LI Jacobson's (1978) 2-factor model of socially desirable responding based on denial and attribution components is reviewed and disputed. A 2nd model distinguishing self-deception and impression management components is reviewed and shown to be related to early factor-analytic work on desirability scales. Two studies, with 511 undergraduates, were conducted to test the model. A factor analysis of commonly used desirability scales (eg, Lie scale of the MMPI, Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale) revealed that the 2 major factors were best interpreted as Self-Deception and Impression Management. A 2nd study employed confirmatory factor analysis to show that the attribution/denial model does not fit the data as well as the self-deception/impression management model. A 3rd study, with 100 Ss, compared scores on desirability scales under anonymous and public conditions. Results show that those scales that had loaded highest on the Impression Management factor showed the greatest mean increase from anonymous to public conditions. It is recommended that impression management, but not self-deception, be controlled in self-reports of personality.(54 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)