Reengineering India: Work, Capital, and Class in an Offshore Economy by Carol Upadhya
Reengineering India: Work, Capital, and Class in an Offshore Economy by Carol Upadhya
复制标题
《再造印度:离岸经济中的工作、资本和阶层》作者:Carol Upadhya
DOI:
10.1007/s41027-019-00160-1
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Lars Olav Aaberg
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lars Olav Aaberg
In Carol Upadhya’s Reengineering India: Work, Capital, and Class in an Offshore Economy, we are presented with an anthropological investigation into the meaning of labour in the information technologies (IT) industry. The monograph is based on fieldwork conducted over a period of 18 months based mostly in Bengaluru, India, but also includes ethnographic data and analysis of IT work and workers in the Netherlands and Germany. The book provides an analysis of how subjectivities of those working in IT are shaped by an industry considered the hallmark of a postliberalization economy and one that offers hope and social mobility for India’s youth from various social locations. While the IT industry in India is mostly associated with social mobility that promises to unshackle economically deprived segments from classand caste-based barriers, Upadhya presents a detailed account of how the IT industry is a site wherein inequality is reproduced rather than subverted for many of its actors. The book is divided into six chapters together with the introduction and conclusion. In chapters one and two, the author delineates the histories of how the IT industry came into being in India and how it creates its workforce. The IT industry has wielded vast moral capital not least through its own comparisons to the Indian state, claiming superiority on the grounds that it is more democratic and transparent. The author begins to take this claim to task, first by analysing how different IT firms recruit candidates. Recruitment often begins before students pass out of their bachelor’s degrees, as companies go to university campuses, interview students and offer them tentative employment contracts. Beyond technical skills, students face two means of evaluation: their grades and their cultural ‘fit’. Upadhya argues that the recruitment process tends to draw from the relatively privileged within India’s higher education due to this highly subjective element of the recruitment process. The focus on grades tend to privilege students who were not admitted through