Defining effective strategies to prevent post-traumatic stress in healthcare emergency workers facing the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.
Defining effective strategies to prevent post-traumatic stress in healthcare emergency workers facing the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1017/s1092852920001637
复制
发表时间:
2020-07-14
期刊:
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Dell'Osso L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Carmassi C;Cerveri G;Bui E;Gesi C;Dell'Osso L
Italy, May 19th. As we write, the end of the COVID-19 outbreak is finally in view; however, its psychological impact on healthcare workers (HCWs) remains an urgent question. Italy was the first European Country to face the pandemic that started in Codogno (Lodi), declared “red zone” and isolated by February 20th 2020. To date, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases exceeds 215 000, with a death toll exceeding 30 000, over 23 000 HCWs being infected and 161 of them—130 physicians and 31 nurses—losing their life to complications of the infection. Because HCWs facing the COVID-19 outbreak were exposed to extreme and prolonged work-related stress with a high risk of exhaustion, burnout and post-traumatic stress reactions, the COVID-19 crisis was defined as the “9/11 of health care systems.” Since the introduction of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders—5th edition (DSM-5), work-related repeated or extreme exposure to aversive details of traumatic events may qualify for a trauma. In line with this, recent literature on burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among first responders and HCWs, highlighted specific risk factors such as the frequent unpredictability of daily work cases and perceived expectations from patients and their families in critical cases/situations. 1, 2 While the Italian health care system was weakened by years and years of budgetary cuts, the COVID-19 outbreak amplified the chronic difficulties, leading to increased risk for negative mental health outcomes among HCWs. First, typical pre-existing risk factors for PTSD were frequently present among Italian HCWs, including female gender and young to middle age with young children. Second, specific characteristics of COVID-19 added further burden: rapidly increased flow of critical patients forcing physicians to make extremely difficult decision tainted with pervasive helplessness; clinical presentation characterized by severe distress, rapidly worsening dyspnea with insidious and unpredictable course, requiring constant medical updating with worldwide emerging multiple clinical manifestations and treatment of the COVID-19 infection increasing distress at the time of patient’s death; constant need for complete isolation during patient care, both for the patient and the providers, given the extremely high contamination risk, and the shortage of protective personal equipment that lead to fear, anger, and resentment against the authorities. Third, the systemic impact of the disease and its social repercussions also included: rapid and sometimes chaotic reorganization of services and logistical challenges for recruiting new emergency departments and intensive care unit (ICU) personnel, both to managing the increasing number of patients and to substitute HCWs becoming ill; introducing unskilled HCWs in highly specialized units, leading to feelings of frustration, isolation, hopelessness, and irritability; lack of social support at work; the need to work with new colleagues or redeployed strangers; lack of social support at home with schools closures and children confined at home; fear of infecting family members leading to further isolation.