Are we legitimate yet
Are we legitimate yet
复制标题
DOI：
10.1108/02621711211191014
复制
发表时间：
2011-12
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Turker Kurt;Ibrahim Duyar;Temel Çalik
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Turker Kurt;Ibrahim Duyar;Temel Çalik
目的-未能确定校长领导和学生成绩之间的任何显着的关系，证明了对假设的价值和合法性的校长领导的关注。本文的目的是通过实证检验校长领导与教师自我效能感之间的关系，为当前的文献做出贡献。本研究采用因果比较研究设计，探讨校长领导、教师自我效能和集体效能之间的直接、间接和中介关系。参与者包括813名小学教师的集群随机样本。数据收集工具的组合组成的多因素领导问卷，集体…
Purpose – Failure to identify any significant relationships between principal leadership and student achievement has proved concerns about the assumed value and legitimacy of principal leadership. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the current literature by empirically testing the relationships between the principal leadership and the teacher self‐efficacy, a construct which has a proven impact on student achievement. The role of collective efficacy on the relationship between transformational leadership of principals and self‐efficacy of teachers was a special focus for the study.Design/methodology/approach – A causal comparative research design was employed to study the direct, indirect, and mediating relationships among principal leadership, teacher self‐efficacy, and collective efficacy in schools. The participants included a cluster‐random sample of 813 primary school teachers. Data gathering instruments composed of a combination of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, the Collective ...