Total Reward and pensions in the UK in the public and private sectors

Total Reward and pensions in the UK in the public and private sectors
复制标题

英国公共和私营部门的总薪酬和养老金

DOI:
10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.010
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Danzer A
Danzer A
中科院分区:
经济学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Danzer A

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

最近围绕公共和私营部门薪酬的相对价值发生了争议。我们提出了一个全面的衡量总回报(TR),其中不仅包括工资,但养老金和其他“实物福利”,评估它作为所有这些付款的总和在一生中的现值,并比较它在英国公共和私营部门受过高等教育。我们的研究结果表明,TR是广泛平等的生命周期高学历的男性,而受过高等教育的女性有一个明显的TR优势,在公共部门的职业生涯结束。我们认为,目前的争议,公共和私营部门的养老金差异和公共/私营部门的薪酬差距的常年问题需要一个终身的角度来看,TR的概念是适当的。
Recent controversy has surrounded the relative value of public and private sector remuneration. We propose a comprehensive measure of Total Reward (TR) which includes not just pay, but pensions and other ‘benefits in kind’, evaluate it as the present value of the sum of all these payments over the lifetime and compare it for the highly educated in the UK public and private sectors. Our results suggest that TR is broadly equalised over the lifecycle for highly educated men while highly educated women have a clear TR advantage in the public sector by the end of their career. We suggest that the current controversy over public–private sector pension differentials and the perennial issues of public/private sector pay gaps requires a lifetime perspective and that the concept of TR is appropriate.
(瑞银养老金系列 8)1957 - 2002 年英国年金率和养老金替代率
DOI: --
发表时间: 2003
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Ian Tonks
通讯作者: Ian Tonks
收益函数和非金钱利益
DOI: --
发表时间: 1976
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
G. Duncan
通讯作者: G. Duncan
DOI: 10.1016/s1573-4463(99)30040-7
发表时间: 1999
期刊: Handbook of Labor Economics
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Lumsdaine;O. Mitchell
通讯作者: O. Mitchell
DOI: 10.2307/1884607
发表时间: 1980-01-01
影响因子: 13.7
作者:
BROWN, C
通讯作者: BROWN, C
DOI: --
发表时间: 1983
期刊: The American Economic Review
影响因子: --
作者:
Stephen A. Woodbury
通讯作者: Stephen A. Woodbury