COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING - ARE LAWS OF LEARNING SAME IN ALL ANIMALS

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING - ARE LAWS OF LEARNING SAME IN ALL ANIMALS
复制标题

DOI:
10.1126/science.188.4189.699
复制
发表时间:
1975-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
56.9
通讯作者:
BITTERMAN, ME
BITTERMAN, ME
中科院分区:
综合性期刊1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
BITTERMAN, ME

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

最近一篇影响力惊人的论文提出了“为什么比较心理学没有理论”的问题,并回答说,这是因为动物心理学家没有能力处理进化历史的“复杂性”。这个问题是错误的,至少在与学习有关的问题上是错误的,而学习一直是动物心理学家主要关心的问题。一个更好的问题是,为什么很少有比较研究,答案是,关于学习的工作几乎从一开始就被一个人所主导
A surprisingly influential recent paper raises the question of" why there is no theory in comparative psychology" and answers that it is because of the inability of animal psychologists to deal with the" intricacies" of evolutionary history (1). The question is the wrong one, at least as it relates to learning, long the principal concern of animal psychologists (2). A better question is why there has been so little comparative research, and the an-swer is that work on learning has been dominated almost fromthe outset by a