How to measure cognitive complexity in human-computer interaction

How to measure cognitive complexity in human-computer interaction
复制标题

如何衡量人机交互中的认知复杂性

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
G.W.M. Rauterberg
G.W.M. Rauterberg
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
G.W.M. Rauterberg

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

提出了行为复杂性(BC)、系统复杂性(SC)和任务复杂性(TC)的概念化度量框架。从这个框架中,认知复杂性(CC)被推导为CC = SC + TC BC。在一项实证研究中,6名初学者和6名专家用交互式数据库管理系统解决了4个不同的认知复杂性问题。为了分析在互动会议期间记录的经验数据,开发了一个特殊的程序。该计划的目的和程序架构进行了说明。四种不同的方法,从文献中定量的方式来衡量复杂性进行了审议和讨论。这4种方法的应用进行了比较和测试的实验的实证结果。McCabe(1976)的方法被证明是最有效的。
A framework to conceptualize measure of behaviour complexity (BC), system complexity (SC) and task complexity (TC) was developed. From this framework cognitive complexity (CC) is derived as CC = SC + TC BC. In an empirical study to investigate different measures of cognitive complexity 6 beginners and 6 experts solved 4 different tasks with an interactive database management system. To analyze the empirical data recorded during the interactive sessions a special program was developed. The program's purpose and the program architecture are described. Four different approaches from the literature to measure complexity in a quantitative way were considered and discussed. Application of these 4 approaches were compared and tested against the empirical results of the experiment. The measure of McCabe (1976) proved to be the most effective.
SR-A(其配体是修饰的低密度脂蛋白)对 1 型糖尿病发病的影响。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2012
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
清水まみ;安田尚史;中村晃;勝田敦美;佐々木弘智;荒井隆志;永田正男;原賢太;横野浩一
通讯作者: 横野浩一