Regional differences and convergence tendency of green development competitiveness in China
Regional differences and convergence tendency of green development competitiveness in China
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119922
复制
发表时间：
2020-05
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
Huan Zhang;Z. Geng;R. Yin;Wei Zhang
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Huan Zhang;Z. Geng;R. Yin;Wei Zhang
绿色发展竞争力在生态文明建设中具有积极作用。本文构建了绿色发展竞争力指标体系，对2003 - 2016年我国30个样本省份的竞争力水平进行了测度，并检验了趋同趋势。研究发现，2003 - 2016年我国绿色发展综合竞争力呈稳步发展态势，东部地区评价最高，东北、中部和西部地区次之。绿色发展竞争力评价指标体系的五个方面呈现出不同的发展态势：绿色高质量增长竞争力和资源节约减排竞争力稳步提升;城市生态环境质量竞争力和绿色生活方式竞争力保持相对稳定，绿色投资竞争力略有下降。区域差异分析表明，西部地区的差异程度依次大于东部、中部和东北地区。东部和东北地区的差异程度变大，中西部地区的差异程度变小。收敛性分析表明，从2003年到2016年，各地区的竞争力水平存在差异，在国家层面没有明显的随机收敛迹象。在区域层面上，可以发现东部地区的评价值与全国平均值存在随机离散。只有河南、湖北、贵州和云南四个省具有随机收敛到区域平均水平的可能性。
Green development competitiveness plays an active role inthe construction of ecological civilization. This researchbuilds a green development competitiveness index system, and measures the competitiveness level of 30 sample provinces in Chinafrom 2003 to 2016 before testing the convergence tendency. It is found that the comprehensive competitiveness of green development in China developed steadily from 2003 to 2016, with the eastern region valuedthe highest, followed by the northeastern, central and western region. The five aspects of evaluation index system for green development competitiveness showed different development tendencies:the competitiveness of green high-quality growth and that of resource conservation and emission reduction sawa steady increase; the competitiveness of urban ecological environment quality and that of green lifestyle remained relatively stable, while the competitiveness of green investment declined slightly. Analysis of regional difference showed that the varying degree of western China was larger than that of eastern, central and northeastern China in order. Besides, the varying degree is becoming larger in eastern and northeastern regions while becoming lower in central and western regions. Convergence analysis showed that from 2003 to 2016, competitiveness level differed from region to region and there were no obvious signs of stochastic convergence at the national level. At the regional level, it can be found that the evaluation values of the eastern region saw stochastic dispersion from the national average. Only four provinces of Henan, Hubei, Guizhou, and Yunnan had possibilities of stochastic convergence to the regional average.