A spatial analytic approach for classifying greenspace and comparing greenspace social equity
A spatial analytic approach for classifying greenspace and comparing greenspace social equity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.03.016
复制
发表时间：
2017-05-01
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
Kimpton, Anthony
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kimpton, Anthony
城市规划者经常坚持“公园最低标准”，以确保与绿地相关的公共健康和环境效益是社会公平的。这些标准指出了绿地的范围和位置，但很少考虑它们的形式和功能。可以说，对绿地社会公平的包容性评估需要对绿地类型进行比较。为了解决如果绿地类型是社会公平的，我开发了一种新的空间分析方法，分类4265绿地根据12个功能，物理特性。然后，我比较了这些绿地类型的社会公平，在澳大利亚的一个首都城市的4524个街区，使用多种操作的社会公平（提供，可达性和人口压力）。我发现，绿色空间的社会公平不同的每一种类型。例如，结果显示，富裕的家庭有丰富的设施丰富的绿地和少数设施贫困的。此外，通过比较多个社会公平的操作，我发现，富裕的家庭可能有一个赤字的舒适性差的绿地类型，但生活更接近这种类型。这些研究结果证实，采用绿色空间类型学和多种社会公平操作可以加深我们对社会公平和绿色空间提供之间的关联的理解。这种空间分析方法既适用于研究其他城市土地利用类型，又可移植到其他城市环境中，并且可以帮助城市规划者，研究人员和政策制定者了解如何提高公益绿地类型的社会公平性。皇冠版权所有（C）2017由爱思唯尔有限公司发布。保留所有权利。
Urban planners frequently adhere to 'park minimum standards' to ensure that public health and environmental benefits associated with greenspace are socially equitable. These standards denote the extent and placement of greenspaces, but rarely consider their form and function. Arguably, an inclusive evaluation of greenspace social equity requires the comparison of greenspace types. To address if greenspace types are socially equitable, I develop a novel spatial analytic approach that classifies 4265 greenspaces according to twelve functional, physical characteristics. I then compare the social equity of these greenspace types using multiple operationalizations of social equity (provision, accessibility, and population pressure) throughout 4524 neighborhoods in a capital city in Australia. I find that greenspace social equity varies for each of these types. For example, results reveal that affluent households have an abundance of amenity rich greenspaces and few amenity poor ones. Further, by comparing across multiple social equity operationalizations, I find that affluent households may have a deficit of the amenity poor greenspace type, but live closer to this type. These findings confirm that employing a greenspace typology and multiple social equity operationalizations can deepen our understanding of the association between social equity and greenspace provision. This spatial analytic approach is both adaptable for examining other urban land use types, and portable to other urban contexts, and can aid urban planners, researchers, and policy makers to understand how to improve the social equity of publicly beneficial greenspace types. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.