Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM

Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM
复制标题

DOI:
10.1099/ijs.0.060301-0
复制
发表时间:
2014-01-01
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Garrity,George M.
Garrity,George M.
中科院分区:
生物学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Oren,Aharon;Garrity,George M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

《细菌法典》涉及原核生物的命名。这可能包括现有名称(已批准的细菌名称列表)以及新名称和新组合。从这个意义上说,《准则》也是在间接处理分类意见。然而,与大多数命名法一样,没有正式记录不涉及创建新名称或新组合的分类意见的机制。特别是,最好向公众广泛提供由创建同义词或订正描述而产生的分类学意见。2004年,《国际系统和进化微生物学杂志》(IJSEM)的编辑委员会一致认为,有必要涵盖以前在IJSEM之外发表的分类意见的这种变化(即创建同义词或更正界限),并引入分类意见的变化清单[以前在IJSEM外部发表的分类意见变化的通知;Euzébany.(2004).int J Syst Evol Microbiol54,1429-1430]。希望在将来的清单中包含分类意见更改的科学家应将相关重印的一份副本或其影印件或PDF文件发送给IJSEM编辑部或清单编辑。必须强调的是,拟议的分类更改的日期是原始公布的日期,而不是清单的公布日期。分类意见更改清单中的分类意见不能被视为有效发表,也不能以任何其他方式得到原核生物系统学国际委员会及其司法委员会的批准。要使用的名称是细菌学家认为的具有给定范围、位置和等级的‘正确名称’(在原则6的意义上)。不一定要在所有情况下都采用特定的名称、范围、职位和级别。因此,分类学意见的变化清单必须被视为对细菌学的服务,它没有“官方特征”,只是提供了一个集中的点,用于登记/索引这种变化,使科学界能够很容易地获得这些变化。
The Bacteriological Code deals with the nomenclature of prokaryotes. This may include existing names (the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names) as well as new names and new combinations. In this sense the Code is also dealing indirectly with taxonomic opinions. However, as with most codes of nomenclature there are no mechanisms for formally recording taxonomic opinions that do not involve the creation of new names or new combinations. In particular, it would be desirable for taxonomic opinions resulting from the creation of synonyms or emended descriptions to be made widely available to the public. In 2004, the Editorial Board of theInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology(IJSEM) agreed unanimously that it was desirable to cover such changes in taxonomic opinions (i.e. the creation of synonyms or the emendation of circumscriptions) previously published outside the IJSEM, and to introduce a List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion [Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM; Euzébyet al.(2004).Int J Syst Evol Microbiol54, 1429–1430]. Scientists wishing to have changes in taxonomic opinion included in future lists should send one copy of the pertinent reprint or a photocopy or a PDF file thereof to the IJSEM Editorial Office or to the Lists Editor. It must be stressed that the date of proposed taxonomic changes is the date of the original publication not the date of publication of the list.Taxonomic opinions included in the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion cannot be considered as validly published nor, in any other way, approved by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and its Judicial Commission. The names that are to be used are those that are the ‘correct names’ (in the sense of Principle 6) in the opinion of the bacteriologist, with a given circumscription, position and rank. A particular name, circumscription, position and rank do not have to be adopted in all circumstances. Consequently, the List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion must be considered as a service to bacteriology and it has no ‘official character’, other than providing a centralized point for registering/indexing such changes in a way that makes them easily accessible to the scientific community.