Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink?
Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1014
复制
发表时间：
1997-08-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Paulson, K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Maki, WS;Frigen, K;Paulson, K
在 5 个实验中，432 名大学生查看了包含 2 个目标的单词列表（目标 1 [T1] 和目标 2 [T2]，以每秒 10 个单词的速度通过快速连续视觉呈现呈现。T1 的识别导致 T2 的识别出现 500 毫秒的损伤（注意眨眼 [AB]）。当 T2 与 T1 或启动分心物 (PD) 强关联时，在整个 AB 时间过程中观察到 T2 的回忆得到改善。参与者忽略了 T1，AB 被消除，但 PD 对 T2 的启动量是暂时的（PD 发生后 100-200 毫秒），尽管目标启动和干扰启动都在 AB 中幸存下来，但两种形式的启动似乎具有不同的基础。假设是由在线注意力过程产生的，但 RSVP 列表的回忆也受到离线记忆过程的影响。
In 5 experiments, 432 college students viewed lists of words containing 2 targets (Target 1 [T1] and Target 2 [T2] presented by rapid serial visual presentation at 10 words per second. Identification of T1 caused a 500-ms impairment in the identification of T2 (the attentional blink [AB]). Improved recall of T2 was observed throughout the time course of the AB when T2 was st strong associate of either T1 or a priming distracter (PD). When participants ignored T1, the AB was eliminated, but the amount of priming was not affected. Priming of T2 by PD was temporary (100-200 ms after the onset of PD). Although target priming and distracter priming both survived the AB, the 2 forms of priming appeared to have different bases. In contrast to priming by PD, priming by T1 was larger, modulated by backward associative strength, and longer lasting. Priming and the AB are hypothesized to result from on-line attentional processes, but recall from RSVP lists is also influenced by off-line memory processes.