Switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: comparison of programmes with and without viral load monitoring
Switching to second-line antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings: comparison of programmes with and without viral load monitoring
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/qad.0b013e32832e05b2
复制
发表时间:
2009-09-10
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Egger, Matthias
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Keiser, Olivia;Tweya, Hannock;Egger, Matthias
Background: In high-income countries, viral load is routinely measured to detect failure of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and guide switching to second-line ART. Viral load monitoring is not generally available in resource-limited settings. We examined switching from nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based first-line regimens to protease inhibitor-based regimens in Africa, South America and Asia.Design and methods: Multicohort study of 17 ART programmes. All sites monitored CD4 cell count and had access to second-line ART and 10 sites monitored viral load. We compared times to switching, CD4 cell counts at switching and obtained adjusted hazard ratios for switching (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from random-effects Weibull models.Results: A total of 20113 patients, including 6369 (31.7%) patients from 10 programmes with access to viral load monitoring, were analysed; 576 patients (2.9%) switched. Low CD4 cell counts at ART initiation were associated with switching in all programmes. Median time to switching was 16.3 months [interquartile range (IQR) 10.1-26.6] in programmes with viral load monitoring and 21.8 months (IQR 14.0-21.8) in programmes without viral load monitoring (P