Are There Global Norms and Universal Standards of Electoral Integrity and Malpractice? Comparing Public and Expert Perceptions
Are There Global Norms and Universal Standards of Electoral Integrity and Malpractice? Comparing Public and Expert Perceptions
复制标题
是否存在关于选举诚信和舞弊的全球规范和普遍标准？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Norris
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Norris
当国际观察员批评选举质量时，这些专家评估是否反映了西方/美国的价值观？或者，是否存在着生活在不同文化中的普通人所共有的选举诚信和舞弊的普遍全球准则？为了考虑这些问题，本文第一部分揭示了选举诚信的核心概念。第二部分介绍了2010- 2012年世界价值观调查（WVS）第六波中首次进行的九个项目的新组合。这套电池的目的是衡量对常见类型的选举诚信和舞弊的看法。第三部分介绍了调查结果。然后，第四部分将每个国家的群众看法与基于专家评价的五个简要指数进行比较。结论总结了主要的研究结果，并考虑其影响。
When international observers criticize the quality of elections, do these expert evaluations reflect ‘Western/American’ values? Or are there universal global norms of electoral integrity and malpractice which are shared by ordinary people living in diverse cultures? To consider these issues, Part I of this paper unpacks the core concept of electoral integrity. Part II introduces a new battery of nine items carried for the first time in the 6th wave of the World Values Survey (WVS) 2010-12. This battery is designed to gauge perceptions of common types of electoral integrity and malpractice. Part III describes the results of the survey. Part IV then compares mass perceptions in each country against five summary indices based on expert evaluations. The conclusion summarizes the main findings and considers their implications.