Mobilities in Socialist and Post-Socialist States
Mobilities in Socialist and Post-Socialist States
复制标题
社会主义和后社会主义国家的流动性
DOI：
10.1057/9781137267290
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
K. Hörschelmann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kathy Burrell;K. Hörschelmann
南斯拉夫社会主义国家的崩溃从根本上改变了其公民的生活。国家的解体伴随着克罗地亚（1991 - 95年）、波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那（1992-95年）和科索沃（1998-99年）的战争、斯洛文尼亚（1991年）的冲突以及1999年北约对南斯拉夫联邦共和国（即现在的塞尔维亚和黑山）的轰炸。塞尔维亚面临着国际社会的孤立和人口的极度贫困，这给人们的日常生活带来了许多剧烈的变化。2000年以后的时期通常被理解为“恢复期”（例如，Greenberg 2011）。然而，尽管千禧年之后的危机与上世纪90年代的严重程度相去甚远，但大多数人仍然认为，这种情况更像是“通往正常之路”，而不是通往稳定之路。因此，2005年至2006年以及2000年代中期，我在塞尔维亚共事的大多数人都认为，这个国家的政治和经济形势仍然不稳定，是某种尚未看到结局的长期过渡。
The collapse of the Yugoslav socialist state changed the lives of its citizens radically.1The state’s disintegration was accompanied by wars in Croatia (1991–95), Bosnia-Herzegovina (1992–95) and Kosovo (1998-99), conflicts in Slovenia (1991) and the NATO bombing of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (what is now Serbia and Montenegro) in 1999. Serbia was faced with international isolation and a radical impoverishment of the population that brought with it many turbulent changes in people’s everyday lives. The period from 2000 onwards is usually understood as a ‘period of recovery’ (e.g., Greenberg 2011). However, although the crisis after the turn of the millennium was a far cry from the severity of the 1990s, most people still felt that the situation was more of a ‘road to normality’ than of stability. Thus, most people I worked with in Serbia in 2005-06 the mid 2000s perceived the situation in the country as still politically and economically unstable, as some kind of prolonged transition whose end was yet unseen.