The social component of the projection behavior of clausal complement contents
The social component of the projection behavior of clausal complement contents
复制标题
分句补语内容投射行为的社会成分
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Taylor Mahler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Taylor Mahler
一些关于预设投射的解释预测，内容与共同点的一致性会影响它是否投射（例如，Heim 1983，Gazdar 1979 a，B）。本文通过一个实验来检验说话人社会身份的共同点信息是否会影响小句补语内容的投射。当演讲者是民主党人或共和党人时，参与者对传达自由派或保守派政治立场的CC的预测进行了评价。正如预期的那样，CC在传达与演讲者的政治派别一致的政治立场时更具投射性：与共和党演讲者相比，自由派CC对民主党人更具投射性，与民主党演讲者相比，保守派CC对共和党人更具投射性。此外，与事实谓词相关联的CC（例如，知道）比与非事实谓词相关联的那些（例如，相信）。这些研究结果表明，社会意义的影响投射意义和社会意义的语义意义的约束，符合以前的研究其他层次的语言结构/感知和社会信息之间的关系。
Some accounts of presupposition projection predict that content's consistency with the Common Ground influences whether it projects (e.g., Heim 1983, Gazdar 1979a,b). I conducted an experiment to test whether Common Ground information about the speaker's social identity influences projection of clausal complement contents (CCs). Participants rated the projection of CCs conveying liberal or conservative political positions when the speaker was either Democrat- or Republican-affiliated. As expected, CCs were more projective when they conveyed political positions consistent with the speaker's political affiliation: liberal CCs were more projective with Democrat compared to Republican speakers, and conservative CCs were more projective with Republican compared to Democrat speakers. In addition, CCs associated with factive predicates (e.g., know) were more projective than those associated with non-factive predicates (e.g., believe). These findings suggest that social meaning influences projective meaning and that social meaning is constrained by semantic meaning, in line with previous research on the relation between other levels of linguistic structure/perception and social information.