Underrated transformations in the open space—The case of an urbanized and multifunctional area
Underrated transformations in the open space—The case of an urbanized and multifunctional area
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.004
复制
发表时间：
2010-03
影响因子：
9.1
通讯作者：
K. Bomans;Thérèse Steenberghen;Valerie Dewaelheyns;Hans Leinfelder;H. Gulinck
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Bomans;Thérèse Steenberghen;Valerie Dewaelheyns;Hans Leinfelder;H. Gulinck
法兰德斯的开放空间经历了不同的转变过程。这些过程与城市化社会内的动态互动以及越来越多的功能对空间的竞争有关。尽管承认动态的土地利用需求，但当前的土地利用和土地覆盖分类并不总是能够捕捉与例如土地利用相关的变化。城乡混合地区的土地利用、生态系统服务和多功能性方面的新来者。在研究复杂且密集使用的空间时，遥感工具和人口普查数据是不够的。因此，本研究旨在利用两个主要来源来确定研究区域法兰德斯（比利时北部）被低估的转型：(i) 公开专家访谈和 (ii) 三个案例研究。这些访谈旨在制定一个新的框架，可用于描述开放空间的转变。将访谈和案例研究中出现的转型过程与当前空间规划政策和现有监测数据中定义和认可的转型过程进行比较，以确定未来空间规划政策的瓶颈和选项。本文的主要结论是（i）对功能和开放空间的分析和分类的批判性观点，因为它目前在土地利用监测和土地利用规划项目中实践，（ii）需要额外的数据来涵盖开放空间的转变过程，以及（iii）需要对开放空间有更完整的愿景。
The open space in Flanders is subjected to different transformation processes. These processes are related to dynamic interactions within an urbanizing society and to competition for space by an increasing number of functions. Despite the acknowledgement of dynamic land use demands, the current categorizations of land use and land cover are not always able to catch transformations related to e.g. newcomers in land use, ecosystem services and multifunctionality in mixed urban–rural areas. Remote sensing tools and census data are insufficient when studying a complex and intensively used space. This research therefore aims to identify underrated transformations in the study area Flanders (the northern part of Belgium) using two main sources: (i) open expert interviews and (ii) three case studies. The interviews serve to formulate a renewed framework that can be used to describe transformations in the open space. The transformation processes that emerge from the interviews and case studies are compared to those defined and recognized in the current spatial planning policy and in existing monitoring data, in order to identify bottlenecks and options for future spatial planning policy. The major conclusions of this paper are (i) a critical view on the analysis and categorization of functions and open space as it is currently practiced in land use monitoring and land use planning programs, (ii) additional data needs to encompass transformation processes in the open space and (iii) the need for a more integral vision for open space.