Improving Diet and Physical Activity with ALIVE A Worksite Randomized Trial

Improving Diet and Physical Activity with ALIVE A Worksite Randomized Trial
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.036
复制
发表时间:
2009-06-01
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Block, Gladys
Block, Gladys
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sternfeld, Barbara;Block, Clifford;Block, Gladys

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

内容:健康的饮食和规律的身体活动赋予许多健康的好处,但这些行为的流行率是相对low.Background:成本效益的策略,需要增加健康饮食和体力活动的population.Design:一个随机对照试验,在2006年进行的,一个为期16周的电子邮件程序,提供个性化定制的,小步的目标,一个个人主页与提示,教育材料;设置/人群:一家大型医疗机构的行政办公室的787名员工自愿参加。主要结果测量:自我报告的总体力活动、中度体力活动(VPA)、剧烈体力活动(VPA)、步行、久坐行为、与对照组相比,干预组的水果和蔬菜、饱和脂肪和反式脂肪以及添加糖的摄入量。在意向治疗分析中(2007年和2008年进行),将后续问卷的无应答者的变化设置为零,与对照组相比,干预组报告MPA增加28.0分钟/周(min/wk)(SE=7.4,p=0.0002); VPA增加12.5分钟/wk(SE=5.7,p=0.03);步行增加21.5分钟/wk(SE=5.5,p=0.0003)。饱和脂肪和反式脂肪的摄入量(克/天[g/天])下降(分别为β =-0.95,SE=0.36,p=0.01; β =-0.29,SE=0.12,p=0.02)。水果和蔬菜的消费量显著增加(p=0.03),添加糖的消费量略有下降(p=0.08)。最大的变化是在基线时不符合行为建议的参与者(相对于对照组,MPA增加55.4分钟/周,反式脂肪减少1.15克/天)。干预组和对照组之间的差异仍然观察4个月后,干预endos.Conclusions:ALIVE是一个有效的计划,为实现显着改善饮食和体力活动。试验注册:NCT 00607009。(Am J Prev Med 2009;36(6):475-483)(C)2009年美国预防医学杂志
Context: Healthy diets and regular physical activity confer many health benefits, but the prevalence of these behaviors is relatively low.Background: Cost-effective strategies are needed to increase healthy eating and physical activity in the population.Design: An RCT, conducted in 2006, of a 16-week e-mail program offered individually tailored, small-step goals; a personal homepage with tips; educational materials; and tracking and simulation tools.Setting/population: Seven hundred eighty-seven employees in the administrative offices of a large healthcare organization volunteered to participate.Main outcome measures: Changes were self-reported for total physical activity; moderate physical activity (VPA); vigorous physical activity (VPA); walking; sedentary behavior; and intake of fruits and vegetables, saturated and trans fats, and added sugars in the intervention group compared to the control group.Results: In intent-to-treat analyses (conducted in 2007 and 2008) that set change in nonresponders to the follow-up questionnaire to zero, the intervention group reported increases of 28.0 tninutes/week (min/wk) of MPA (SE=7.4, p=0.0002); 12.5 min/wk of VPA (SE=5.7, p=0.03); and 21.5 min/wk of walking (SE=5.5, p=0.0003) relative to the control group. Intake of both saturated and trans fats (grams/day [g/day]) declined (beta=-0.95, SE=0.36, p=0.01; beta=-0.29, SE=0.12, p=0.02, respectively). The consumption of fruits and vegetables increased significantly (p=0.03), and the consumption of added sugars decreased marginally (p=0.08). The largest changes were in participants who did not meet behavioral recommendations at baseline (increase of 55.4 min/wk of MPA and decrease of 1.15 g/day of trans fats, relative to the control group). Differences between the intervention and control groups were still observed 4 months after the intervention ended.Conclusions: ALIVE is an effective program for achieving significant improvement in diet and physical activity.Trial registration: NCT00607009. (Am J Prev Med 2009;36(6):475-483) (C) 2009 American Journal of Preventive Medicine