Response to: "Rescuing the NIH before it is too late".

Response to: "Rescuing the NIH before it is too late".
复制标题

回应:“在为时已晚之前拯救 NIH”。

DOI:
10.1172/jci28894
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
The Journal of clinical investigation
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Li,Tin
Li,Tin
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Alexander,DuaneF;Alving,BarbaraM;Battey,JamesF;Berg,JeremyM;Collins,FrancisS;Fauci,AnthonyS;Gallin,JohnI;Grady,PatriciaA;Hodes,RichardJ;Hrynkow,SharonH;Insel,ThomasR;Jones,JackF;Katz,StephenI;Landis,StoryC;Li,Tin

文献摘要

相似文献

作为美国国立卫生研究院27个研究所和中心的负责人,我们想对安德鲁·马克斯在他最近的社论中提出的观点做出回应。虽然我们理解科学界的担忧,但美国国立卫生研究院目前的举措和方向是通过反映开放性和持续的选民投入的规划过程制定的,所有这些都旨在评估科学机会和解决公共卫生需求。
We, the directors of the 27 NIH institutes and centers, wanted to respond to the points made by Andrew Marks in his recent editorial. While we appreciate that the scientific community has concerns, the current initiatives and directions of the NIH have been developed through planning processes that reflect openness and continued constituency input, all aimed at assessing scientific opportunities and addressing public health needs.