A More-Than-Representational Understanding of Heritage? The ‘Past’ and the Politics of Affect
A More-Than-Representational Understanding of Heritage? The ‘Past’ and the Politics of Affect
复制标题
对“过去”和影响政治的超越代表性的理解？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Waterton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Waterton
这篇评论探讨了位于遗产研究和地理学之间的交叉点的辩论，特别是那些围绕着超过代表性的理论。这些理论，审查表明，推进遗产领域内的最新发展与那些意义上的“现在”，所以往往被传统的遗产理解忽视。支撑这一贡献的知识传统主要来自文化地理学领域，特别是那些触及触觉、经验、听觉、情感和声音的知识传统。这给遗产研究领域带来的是一种从身体、实践和表演性方面对遗产进行概念化的有力而独特的方式，同时坚持认为我们与遗产的接触是通过一系列具体的倾向和互动发生的。换句话说，它坚持认为，我们，作为遗产研究者，变得更加关注了解和做遗产的不同可能性：它的意义或回答更广泛的人的方式（在Thrift 2008之后）。
This review examines debates situated at the intersection between heritage studies and geography, particularly those that revolve around more-than-representational theories. These theories, the review suggests, advance recent developments within the heritage field concerned with those senses of ‘the now’ so often left neglected by conventional understandings of heritage. The intellectual traditions underpinning this contribution draw primarily from the field of cultural geography, especially those that touch upon the tactile, experiential, aural, emotional and sonic. What this lends to the field of heritage studies is a vigorous and distinct way of conceptualising heritage in terms of the body, practice and performativity, together with an insistence that our engagements with it occur through a range of embodied dispositions and interactions. In other words, it insists that we, as heritage researchers, become more attentive to different possibilities for knowing and doing heritage: the ways in which it makes sense or answers back to a fuller range of people (after Thrift 2008).