Vaccine response following anti-CD20 therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 905 patients.

Vaccine response following anti-CD20 therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 905 patients.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004629
复制
发表时间:
2021-06-21
期刊:
影响因子:
7.5
通讯作者:
Hicks LK
Hicks LK
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Vijenthira A;Gong I;Betschel SD;Cheung M;Hicks LK

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的目的是对接受抗CD 20治疗的患者的疫苗反应性文献进行系统综述。检索了截至2021年1月4日的PubMed和EMBASE,以识别在接受抗CD 20治疗的患者(包括血液恶性肿瘤或自身免疫性疾病患者)中进行的疫苗免疫原性研究。主要结果是报告的每种疫苗的血清保护(SP)、血清转换(SC)和/或血清应答率。由于大流行性流感疫苗(2009 H1N1)对SP和SC的定义进行了标准化,并且代表了与COVID-19疫苗相似的新型主要抗原,因此对该疫苗研究的SC进行了荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型计算合并估计值、相对获益比(RB)和95%置信区间(CI)。纳入了38项研究(905例接受抗CD 20治疗的患者)(19项血液恶性肿瘤患者研究)。接受积极抗CD 20治疗(自末次给药后<3个月)的患者对所有类型疫苗的反应均较差。这些患者接种1剂大流行性流感疫苗后SC的合并估计值为3%(95% CI,0%-9%),与健康对照相比的RB为0.05(95% CI,0-0.73),与疾病对照相比的RB为0.22(95% CI,0.09-0.56)。与对照组相比,SC似乎在治疗后至少6个月内消除(抗CD 20治疗后3-6个月,与健康组相比RB为0.50 [95% CI,0.24-1.06],与疾病对照组相比RB为0.44 [95% CI,0.23-0.84])。对于所有类型的疫苗,对疫苗接种的反应随着时间的推移而逐渐改善,但即使在治疗后12个月也可能达不到健康对照的水平。
The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on vaccine responsiveness in patients who have received anti-CD20 therapy. PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to 4 January 2021 to identify studies of vaccine immunogenicity in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy, including patients with hematologic malignancy or autoimmune disease. The primary outcomes were seroprotection (SP), seroconversion (SC), and/or seroresponse rates for each type of vaccine reported. As the pandemic influenza vaccine (2009 H1N1) has standardized definitions for SP and SC, and represented a novel primary antigen similar to the COVID-19 vaccine, meta-analysis was conducted for SC of studies of this vaccine. Pooled estimates, relative benefit ratios (RBs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Thirty-eight studies (905 patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy) were included (19 studies of patients with hematologic malignancies). Patients on active (<3 months since last dose) anti-CD20 therapy had poor responses to all types of vaccines. The pooled estimate for SC after 1 pandemic influenza vaccine dose in these patients was 3% (95% CI, 0% to 9%), with an RB of 0.05 (95% CI, 0-0.73) compared with healthy controls and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.09-0.56) compared with disease controls. SC compared with controls seems abrogated for at least 6 months following treatment (3-6 months post anti-CD20 therapy with an RB of 0.50 [95% CI, 0.24-1.06] compared with healthy and of 0.44 [95% CI, 0.23-0.84] compared with disease controls). For all vaccine types, response to vaccination improves incrementally over time, but may not reach the level of healthy controls even 12 months after therapy.
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203104
发表时间: 2013-11-01
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Barendregt, Jan J.;Doi, Suhail A.;Vos, Theo
通讯作者: Vos, Theo
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2035389
发表时间: 2021-02-04
期刊: The New England journal of medicine
影响因子: --
作者:
Baden LR;El Sahly HM;Essink B;Kotloff K;Frey S;Novak R;Diemert D;Spector SA;Rouphael N;Creech CB;McGettigan J;Khetan S;Segall N;Solis J;Brosz A;Fierro C;Schwartz H;Neuzil K;Corey L;Gilbert P;Janes H;Follmann D;Marovich M;Mascola J;Polakowski L;Ledgerwood J;Graham BS;Bennett H;Pajon R;Knightly C;Leav B;Deng W;Zhou H;Han S;Ivarsson M;Miller J;Zaks T;COVE Study Group
通讯作者: COVE Study Group
DOI: 10.1007/s10875-012-9813-x
发表时间: 2013-02
影响因子: 9.1
作者:
Eisenberg RA;Jawad AF;Boyer J;Maurer K;McDonald K;Prak ET;Sullivan KE
通讯作者: Sullivan KE
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21203
发表时间: 2005-08-01
期刊: CANCER
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
Cooksley, CD;Avritscher, EBC;Elting, LS
通讯作者: Elting, LS
DOI: 10.1111/acel.12959
发表时间: 2019-08-01
期刊: AGING CELL
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Avivi, Irit;Zisman-Rozen, Simona;Melamed, Doron
通讯作者: Melamed, Doron