Reverse Iterative Deepening for Finite-Horizon MDPs with Large Branching Factors

Reverse Iterative Deepening for Finite-Horizon MDPs with Large Branching Factors
复制标题

具有大分支因子的有限范围 MDP 的逆向迭代深化

DOI:
10.1609/icaps.v22i1.13523
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Daniel S. Weld
Daniel S. Weld
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Kolobov;P. Dai;Mausam;Daniel S. Weld

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

与以往的竞赛不同,2011年国际概率规划竞赛(IPPC-2011)强调了具有大分支因子的有限时域奖励最大化问题。这些MDP模拟了更现实的规划场景,并向以前最先进的规划者提出了挑战(例如,来自IPPC-2008的那些),其主要基于域确定--一种更适合于具有小分支因子的目标导向的MDP的技术。此外,大的分支因子也使得RTDP和LAO风格算法的现有实现效率低下。在本文中,我们介绍了GLUTTON,我们的规划师在IPPC-2011,这些具有挑战性的MDPs表现良好。GLUTTON使用的主要算法是LR 2 TDP,这是一种基于LRTDP的有限时间问题优化算法,围绕着反向迭代深化的新思想。我们详细介绍了LR 2 TDP本身以及GLUTTON中包含的一系列优化,这些优化帮助LR 2 TDP在具有大分支因子的困难问题上实现具有竞争力的性能-对转换函数进行子采样,分离出自然动态,缓存转换函数样本等。实验表明,GLUTTON和PROST,IPPC-2011年的赢家,有互补的优势,与GLUTTON表现出上级性能的问题与几个高回报的终端状态。
In contrast to previous competitions, where the problems were goal-based, the 2011 International Probabilistic Planning Competition (IPPC-2011) emphasized finite-horizon reward maximization problems with large branching factors. These MDPs modeled more realistic planning scenarios and presented challenges to the previous state-of-the-art planners (e.g., those from IPPC-2008), which were primarily based on domain determinization — a technique more suited to goal-oriented MDPs with small branching factors. Moreover, large branching factors render the existing implementations of RTDP- and LAO-style algorithms inefficient as well. In this paper we present GLUTTON, our planner at IPPC-2011 that performed well on these challenging MDPs. The main algorithm used by GLUTTON is LR2TDP, an LRTDP-based optimal algorithm for finite-horizon problems centered around the novel idea of reverse iterative deepening. We detail LR2TDP itself as well as a series of optimizations included in GLUTTON that help LR2TDP achieve competitive performance on difficult problems with large branching factors -- subsampling the transition function, separating out natural dynamics, caching transition function samples, and others. Experiments show that GLUTTON and PROST, the IPPC-2011 winner, have complementary strengths, with GLUTTON demonstrating superior performance on problems with few high-reward terminal states.