Communism + transnational: the rediscovered equation of internationalism in the Comintern years
Communism + transnational: the rediscovered equation of internationalism in the Comintern years
复制标题
跨国共产主义：共产国际时期重新发现的国际主义方程式
DOI：
10.3898/175864318823243726
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
B. Studer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sabine Dullin;B. Studer
1917年10月后，共产主义体现在一个由莫斯科组织并以其为中心的国际中。这被称为第三国际，共产国际或共产国际，存在于1919年至1943年。共产主义还催生了一种新的国际主义，它将人们联系在一起，从哈莱姆到莫斯科，从汉堡到布宜诺斯艾利斯，从马赛到德班，从伦敦到上海。它催生了全球性的抗议和斗争时刻，以及无数不同缩写的组织。这种国际主义通过其革命的、反法西斯的和反帝国主义的范围，证明比赋予它生命的国际更持久，更全球化。共产国际在哪些方面成为世界范围内的项目和斗争的“启动”，这些项目和斗争在当代世界，特别是欧洲以外的世界留下了印记？在这篇文章中，我们试图为这个问题提供一些答案。我们应该从一开始就注意到，如果没有该领域最近的创新，我们的调查是不可能的。共产主义是跨国的，但我们需要跨国历史的视角来思考它。长期以来，共产主义（和其他主题一样）的研究一直受到一种民族主义框架的束缚，这种分析模式倾向于对国家政党和组织进行逐国研究
After October 1917, communism was embodied in an International that was organised by and centred on Moscow. This was known as the Third International, the Communist International or the Comintern, which existed from 1919 to 1943. Communism also spawned a new internationalism which connected people around causes from Harlem to Moscow, Hamburg to Buenos Aires, Marseille to Durban, London to Shanghai; it gave rise to global moments of protest and struggle, and myriad diverse organisations of many different acronyms. This internationalism proved to be, through its revolutionary, anti-fascist and anti-imperialist scope, both more enduring and more global than the International which had given it life. In what ways did the Comintern serve as a ‘start-up’ for worldwide projects and struggles which have left their imprint on the contemporary world, in particular outside of Europe? In this article we try to offer some answers to this question. We should note from the beginning that our inquiry would not have been possible without recent innovations in the field. Communism is transnational, but we needed the perspective of transnational history to be able to think about it as such. For a long time works on communism (as on other topics) had been bound by a nationally-minded framework, a mode of analysis which favoured country-by-country studies of national parties and organisations