‘They are bombing now’: ‘Intercultural Dialogue’ in times of conflict
‘They are bombing now’: ‘Intercultural Dialogue’ in times of conflict
复制标题
“他们现在正在轰炸”：冲突时期的“跨文化对话”
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Alison Phipps
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alison Phipps
本文认为，“跨文化对话”的概念在其目前的主要表现形式已经走到了尽头。我认为，这一概念是一个可能的工作，并在稳定，开放和平等的司法管辖区，那里有相对的“免于恐惧和欲望的自由”，但它是在最好的情况下，有限的，在最坏的情况下，危险的情况下，在冲突和侵略的情况下，并在不稳定的条件下，标志着目前的全球化形式。在这方面，我要谈谈2012年巴勒斯坦终身学习项目在加沙地带进行的实地访问。我把卡罗琳·格尔齐格与哈马斯的工作、让·保罗·莱德拉赫的冲突转化实践以及格雷伯、比戈和斯卡利对9/11后紧急情况和安全状况的理论和实践考虑联系起来。我这样做是为了主张一个重新政治化的跨文化对话的概念，这样它可能适合语言和跨文化交际领域所关注的不稳定性条件。
This article argues that the concept of ‘Intercultural Dialogue’ in its present dominant manifestation has run its course. I argue that this concept is one which may work and make sense in stable, open and equal jurisdictions where there is relative ‘freedom from fear and want’, but that it is at best, limited and at worst, dangerous when used in situations of conflict and aggression and under the creeping conditions of precarity which mark out the present form of globalisation. In this, I turn to field visits undertaken in the Gaza Strip in 2012 with the Life Long Learning in Palestine project. I make a connection to the work of Carolin Goerzig, with Hamas, to the conflict transformation practice of Jean Paul Lederach and to Graeber, Bigo and Scarry's theoretical and practical consideration of emergency and security conditions post-9/11. I do so in order to argue for a re-politicised concept of intercultural dialogue such that it might fit the conditions of precarity with which the field of Language and Intercultural Communication is concerned.