SOME BASIC FACTS, OLD AND NEW, ABOUT TRIPLY PERIODIC EMBEDDED MINIMAL SURFACES
SOME BASIC FACTS, OLD AND NEW, ABOUT TRIPLY PERIODIC EMBEDDED MINIMAL SURFACES
复制标题
关于三周期嵌入极小曲面的一些新旧基本事实
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Hoffman
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Hoffman
In the last twenty years, triply-periodic embedded minimal surfaces have been of great interest and utility to researchers in chemistry, cystallography and material science. The classical examples of Schwarz, Neovious et al., dating from the 19th century were known, but seemed to rest on the periphery of modern mathematical interest in minimal surfaces. The monograph of Schoen, which may fairly be said to be the source of modern interest in the subject, presented many new examples, but this work was much better known to scientists than to mathematicians. Except for the gyroid, few of Schoen’s examples have had very much impact, until quite recently, in the field of mathematics proper. This has changed recently due in part to the work of Karcher, Fischer-Koch, Wohlgemuth, Nitsche, and Ross. Of course, of primary interest to scientists is the fact that these triply-periodic embedded minimal surfaces are the common boundary of two connected intertwined solid regions, referred to as labyrinths that are themselves triply-periodic. These labyrinths are defined as the components of the complement of the surface in . Minimal surfaces have nonpositive Gauss curvature and this seems to be an important secondary property of the labyrinthine interface. Such a surface makes very plain the underlying symmetry group of the labyrinths. In some of the applications of these minimal surfaces in science, the fact that they have zero mean curvature does not seem to be a critical property. In those cases, the assumption that the dividing surface is minimal may be a confusing and unnecessary restriction. To illustrate this, consider the following list of questions about triply-periodic embedded minimal surfaces.