The Solomon system FSol(3) does not occur as fusion system of a 2-block
The Solomon system FSol(3) does not occur as fusion system of a 2-block
复制标题
所罗门系统 FSol(3) 不会作为 2 块的融合系统出现
DOI:
10.1016/j.jalgebra.2005.09.026
复制
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
0.9
通讯作者:
R. Kessar
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Kessar
Let p be a prime number. Fusion systems (referred to as full Frobenius systems in [29], and as saturated fusion systems in [6]) on finite p-groups, were introduced by Puig in the context of local block theory. To each pair (G, P) where G is a finite group and P is a Sylow p-subgroup of G, is associated a fusion system FG (P) on P called a p-fusion system of G, which reflects the p-fusion pattern of G. Similarly, to each quadruple (H, b, Q, e) where H is a finite group, b is a p-block of H, and (Q, e) is a maximal b-Brauer pair (that is Q is a defect group of G and e is a p-block of CG (Q) in correspondence with b) is associated a fusion system F (H, b)(Q, e) on P, called a fusion system of b. An interesting fusion system is the Solomon system FSol (3) which is a system on a Sylow 2-subgroup of the classical group Spin7 (3). FSol (3) is defined and studied in [22], but was implicitly considered by Solomon in [32]. Solomon’s results imply that FSol (3) is “exotic,” that is there is no finite group having FSol (3) as a 2-fusion system. As a consequence, Solomon proved that the only finite simple group having a Sylow 2-subgroup isomorphic to that of the Conway group. 3 is. 3, an important step in the classification of finite simple groups. In [4], Benson constructed a topological space which would have been the 2-completed classifying space of a finite group having FSol (3) as 2-fusion system (had such a group existed), and he predicted that this construction was an instance of a general theory, which insight was realized in the Broto–Levi–Oliver theory of p-local groups in [6].