Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ptsp.2017.09.004
复制
发表时间：
2018-01-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Yi, Liu Chiao
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martinez, Bruna Reclusa;Sauers, Andrea D. Lopes;Yi, Liu Chiao
目的：本研究的目的是描述翻译和文化适应，并检验巴西版功能性踝关节不稳定识别问卷(IdFAI)的效度和信度。设计：这是一项临床测量。地点：本研究在巴西圣保罗联邦大学进行。参与者：50名大学生参与翻译和文化适应，另50名学生参与测量(效度和信度)。主要观察指标：巴西IdFAI的跨文化适应使用标准指南完成。为了效度和可靠性，这些人被要求在同一天完成IdFAI测试，最多在两周后完成。使用Spearman‘s相关系数将巴西IdFAI与视觉模拟不稳定性评分(VAS-I)、坎伯兰踝关节不稳定工具(CAIT)和下肢功能评分(LEFS)进行相关性分析。重测信度和内部一致性分别采用组内相关(ICC2，1)和Cronbach‘sα检验。结果：巴西IdFAI量表与CAIT量表具有较强的相关性，与VAS-I和LEFS量表具有中等相关性，具有良好的信度、内部一致性和一致性。结论：巴西IdFAI问卷是鉴定功能性踝关节不稳定的有效和可靠的工具。它可以在临床和研究环境中使用。(C)爱思唯尔有限公司发布的2017年。
Objectives: The aim of this research was to describe the translation and cultural adaptation, and to test the validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire.Design: This was a clinical measurement.Setting: This research took place at the Federal University of Sao Paulo in Brazil.Participants: Fifty college students participated in the translation and cultural adaptation, while another 50 students participated in the measurements (validity and reliability).Main outcome measures: The cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian IdFAI was accomplished using standard guidelines. For the validity and reliability, the individuals were asked to complete the IdFAI tests on the same day, and after two weeks maximum. The validity was assessed by correlating the Brazilian IdFAI with the Visual Analog Scale for Instability (VAS-I), the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) using Spearman's correlation coefficient. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency were determined by using an intraclass correlation (ICC2,1) and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. The agreement [standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change at 90% (MDC90)] and the floor and ceiling effects were also assessed.Results: The Brazilian IdFAI had strong correlation with the CAIT and moderate correlations with the VAS-I and LEFS scale, with excellent reliability, internal consistency and agreement. No ceiling or floor effects were observed.Conclusion: The Brazilian IdFAI questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument to identify functional ankle instability. It can be used in both clinical and research settings. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.